<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows Search 4.0 Desktop Performance tips and considerations</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/matthewms/archive/2008/11/19/windows-search-4-0-desktop-performance-tips-and-considerations.aspx</link><description>Doing a lot of work with Windows Search I have learned how the tool works and I have worked with a lot of great folks at corporate to help put together some fantastic information on performance tips and considerations.&amp;#160; Also in this post I wanted</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Windows Search 4.0 84% faster</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/matthewms/archive/2008/11/19/windows-search-4-0-desktop-performance-tips-and-considerations.aspx#3156428</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:24:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3156428</guid><dc:creator>The blog of Rob Margel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt Hester has just posted up a blog about performance and stability improvements in Windows Search&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Search 4.0 Desktop Performance tips and considerations</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/matthewms/archive/2008/11/19/windows-search-4-0-desktop-performance-tips-and-considerations.aspx#3157167</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:57:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3157167</guid><dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Look at the hot between XP and Vista ... XP always beats Vista's hot, whether it's version 3 or 4 of search. &amp;nbsp;Seems like a vista specific issue then, not a search issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'd also be interested in learn why XP takes twice as long on a cold query in search 4.0&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>