<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Matt Deacon's digestive blog : Enterprise Architecture</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/archive/tags/Enterprise+Architecture/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Enterprise Architecture</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Integration V interoperability</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/archive/2007/07/26/integration-v-interoperability.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1617430</guid><dc:creator>Matt Deacon</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/comments/1617430.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1617430</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;At a recent NCC workshop on &lt;A href="http://www.ncc.co.uk/ea-se/"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;we spent a while discussing what is meant in terms of Integration and Interoperability. Both heavily used terms in the industry but that actually are hard to define once you come down to it. The used Wikipedia definitions for “Joined up” and “Seamless” and as such suggested that:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Integration equivalent to “Joined Up”&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Interoperability equivalent to “Seamless”&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I’ve looked for these definitions on Wikipedia and must confess I couldn’t find them. Having said that I am not sure why they didn’t just look up Integration or Interoperability directly – that said the definitions leave you with wondering why there are two words at all?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_integration" target=_blank mce_href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_integration"&gt;Digital integration&lt;/A&gt;&lt;I&gt;&amp;nbsp;is the idea that data or information on any given electronic device can be read or manipulated by another device using a standard format&lt;/I&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interoperability" target=_blank mce_href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interoperability"&gt;Interoperability&lt;/A&gt; is the &lt;I&gt;ability of two or more systems or components to exchange information and to use the information that has been exchanged &lt;/I&gt;(IEEE)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wikipedia does go on to say that Interoperability is the &lt;I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"&gt;capability of different programs to exchange data via a common set of business procedures&lt;/I&gt;all of which doesn’t add much clarity.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They also include the ISO/IEC 2382-01 definition that adds &lt;I&gt;... in a manner that requires the user to have little or no knowledge of the unique characteristics of those units”&lt;/I&gt; which could lead back to the ‘seamless’ interpretation which to my mind is also a concern.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Personally, I don’t think any of these fully capture the essence of Integration and Interoperability and come to that matter, I use them so frequently that I am now not sure how I would define them myself!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyway, by the end of that part of the workshop I did end up with a mind map from what was discussed that I think provides quite a good coverage of the issues that integration interoperability encompass.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thoughts welcomed!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG title="Integration Mindmap" style="WIDTH: 640px; HEIGHT: 347px" height=347 alt="Integration Mindmap" src="http://blogs.technet.com/photos/matt_deacon/images/1617337/640x347.aspx" width=640 mce_src="http://blogs.technet.com/photos/matt_deacon/images/1617337/640x347.aspx"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Oh yes, and as for the rest of the workshop ... that’s more than enough for another blog but I need to do some more thinking on that first!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But if you’re interested take a look at the &lt;A class="" href="http://www.ncc.co.uk/ea-se/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.ncc.co.uk/ea-se/"&gt;NCC EA-SE professionalism programme&lt;/A&gt; and join in the fun!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1617430" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/archive/tags/Architecture/default.aspx">Architecture</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/archive/tags/Interoperability/default.aspx">Interoperability</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/archive/tags/Enterprise+Architecture/default.aspx">Enterprise Architecture</category></item><item><title>Does Microsoft get Enterprise Architecture?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/archive/2007/06/20/does-microsoft-get-enterprise-architecture.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1301441</guid><dc:creator>Matt Deacon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/comments/1301441.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1301441</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Good question ... &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Well &lt;A class="" title="Mike Walker" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/mikewalker/archive/2007/06/18/msdn-enterprise-architecture-site-launched.aspx" target=_blank mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/mikewalker/archive/2007/06/18/msdn-enterprise-architecture-site-launched.aspx"&gt;Mike Walker &lt;/A&gt;from Microsoft is charged with finding out and it should be an interesting journey one which I have always pushed for the need to work hand in hand with Industry. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm about to launch my own campaign on the enterprise too so it'll be interesting to see where we intersect!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;According to Mike the &lt;A href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/architecture/bb469938.aspx"&gt;Enterprise Architecture site on MSDN&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;will start to provide articles, webcasts, blogs, and architecture guidance around the subject of Enterprise Architecture. About time:)!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1301441" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/archive/tags/Architecture/default.aspx">Architecture</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/matt_deacon/archive/tags/Enterprise+Architecture/default.aspx">Enterprise Architecture</category></item></channel></rss>