<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title> Mat Stephen's SQL Server WebLog : Replication</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/Replication/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Replication</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>New SQL 2005 code samples available</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/2006/01/02/416760.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 20:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:416760</guid><dc:creator>Mat_Stephen</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/comments/416760.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/commentrss.aspx?PostID=416760</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I guess now the pressure is off to release the product we'll see more useful samples comming out of corp; here's a link to the latest December update:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/sql/downloads/samples/default.aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/sql/downloads/samples/default.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=416760" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/Business+Intelligence/default.aspx">Business Intelligence</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/Reporting+Services/default.aspx">Reporting Services</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/Free+SQL+Server+Tools_2C00_+Utilities+and+Addins/default.aspx">Free SQL Server Tools, Utilities and Addins</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2005/default.aspx">SQL Server 2005</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/SQL+Server+Integration+Services/default.aspx">SQL Server Integration Services</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/Replication/default.aspx">Replication</category></item><item><title>Upgrading a SQL Replication Topology</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/2005/08/23/ReplicationUpgrade.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:409674</guid><dc:creator>Mat_Stephen</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/comments/409674.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/commentrss.aspx?PostID=409674</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Jonathan Allen wrote to me asking what order one should upgrade servers in a replication topology - pointing out that this doesn't seem obviouis from Books On Line, which I agree.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The answer is essentially the same as for any previous upgrade:&amp;nbsp; Distributor first (as it has to handle new and old log record formats), then the Publisher and finally the Subscribers.&lt;FONT size=2&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=409674" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2005/default.aspx">SQL Server 2005</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/Replication/default.aspx">Replication</category></item><item><title>Follow up on Replication Columns question in my TechNet SQL 2005 presentation (14/6/05) </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/2005/06/22/406702.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406702</guid><dc:creator>Mat_Stephen</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/comments/406702.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/commentrss.aspx?PostID=406702</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Question:&amp;nbsp; How many columns does SQL Server 2005 allow in a published article (SQL Server 2000 was linited to 254)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Answer: The column limit for transactional replication, I'm informed,&amp;nbsp;is now in excess of 1000.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=406702" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2005/default.aspx">SQL Server 2005</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/Post+Event+Follow+Up/default.aspx">Post Event Follow Up</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/mat_stephen/archive/tags/Replication/default.aspx">Replication</category></item></channel></rss>