<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Technology Treading Lightly : Windows Server 2008</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/markaggar/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Windows Server 2008</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Server Efficiency Pot o' Gold</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/markaggar/archive/2008/12/10/server-efficiency-pot-o-gold.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3166543</guid><dc:creator>markaggar</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/markaggar/comments/3166543.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/markaggar/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3166543</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;My colleague Matt Robben from the Windows Server performance team has produced a very comprehensive &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/pnppwr/powermgmt/Svr_Pwr_ITAdmin.mspx" mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/pnppwr/powermgmt/Svr_Pwr_ITAdmin.mspx"&gt;white paper&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance" mce_href="http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance"&gt;accompanying blog post&lt;/A&gt; which goes into great detail about how you can save&amp;nbsp;energy with Windows Server 2008 power management, including new options for increasing savings even further (up to 10% more than the default configuration, based on the systems the performance team tested).&amp;nbsp; Even if you aren't running Windows Server 2008, the white paper is chock full of useful advice on how to save energy through your hardware configuration and the components you use.&amp;nbsp; If you operate, spec or buy servers, this is a must read.&lt;?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;The paper correctly points out that the cost to power and cool the server is the same if not more than the cost of buying it when amortized over three years.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;With this in mind, you’re probably thinking that any investment in power efficient hardware is worth the potentially extra&amp;nbsp;cost.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;Generally it is, but there are some exceptions.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;For instance, based on some analysis I did a few months back of SPEC power benchmarks, it turns out that buying&amp;nbsp;low power processors might not make much financial sense - depending&amp;nbsp;on the price you pay.&amp;nbsp; I calculated that with a $200 spread between&amp;nbsp;two equally performant processors with different&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power" mce_href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power"&gt;TDP&lt;/A&gt;s (Thermal Design Power), the ROI is about 7 years – obviously way beyond the life of the machine.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;However, the $200 difference in question was based on 'list' prices.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;On Amazon.com (they really do sell everything!), the difference was only $30 – which had a payback of about 7 months for a single processor.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;This obviously applies to other components as well (e.g. price per GB for 2.5” vs 3.5” disk drives).&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;If more efficient components are more expensive, then it might be worth doing some rudimentary math to see if the power savings will ever exceed the increased cost of the components before the machine is retired.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3166543" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/markaggar/archive/tags/Technology+Footprint+Reduction/default.aspx">Technology Footprint Reduction</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/markaggar/archive/tags/Server+Efficiency/default.aspx">Server Efficiency</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/markaggar/archive/tags/Green+IT/default.aspx">Green IT</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/markaggar/archive/tags/Power+Management/default.aspx">Power Management</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/markaggar/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008/default.aspx">Windows Server 2008</category></item></channel></rss>