<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Enterprise ARCHITECTURE TEAMS FINALLY RECOGNIZING THE VALUE OF infrastructure ARCHITECTURE LEADERSHIP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/lcurtis/archive/2008/07/17/enterprise-architecture-teams-finally-recognizing-the-value-of-infrastructure-architecture-leadership.aspx</link><description>Forrester recently published a report: Infrastructure Architects Link Technology Strategy With Long-Term EA and Business Goals It&amp;#8217;s a decent article.&amp;#160; For far too long many enterprise teams have viewed infrastructure architects as too low level</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Enterprise Architects finally value Infrastructure Architects</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/lcurtis/archive/2008/07/17/enterprise-architecture-teams-finally-recognizing-the-value-of-infrastructure-architecture-leadership.aspx#3111650</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:57:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3111650</guid><dc:creator>Architects Rule!</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;For far too long many enterprise teams have viewed infrastructure architects as too low level, not impacting&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>