<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Time to Reflect : Collaboration</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/koen_daems/archive/tags/Collaboration/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Collaboration</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Ferris: IBM’s Open Collaboration Client Solution Saves Money?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/koen_daems/archive/2009/01/10/3180091.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:50:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3180091</guid><dc:creator>Koen Daems</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/koen_daems/comments/3180091.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/koen_daems/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3180091</wfw:commentRss><description>A very good Study and good comments by Peter show that IBM’s talk about being cheaper than Microsoft is based on… nothing. Read it on Peter’s blog:&amp;#160; http://www.peterdehaas.net/2009/01/ferris-ibms-open-collaboration-client-solution-saves-money.html...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/koen_daems/archive/2009/01/10/3180091.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3180091" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/koen_daems/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/koen_daems/archive/tags/Collaboration/default.aspx">Collaboration</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/koen_daems/archive/tags/IBM/default.aspx">IBM</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/koen_daems/archive/tags/Study/default.aspx">Study</category></item></channel></rss>