http://blogs.technet.com/kevinsul_blog/archive/2006/01/25/418088.aspxSo in speaking with many of my University customers, I have found that many of them are in a complicated situation when it comes to trying to implement SMS due to overlapping IP/AD Site boundary constraints. In certain situations, these folks would likeen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.technet.com/kevinsul_blog/archive/2006/01/25/418088.aspx#3182523Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:57:25 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3182523erik_westergren@msn.com<p>Hi</p> <p>This setup seems very intersting, agree that option 1 is the best. </p> <p>Have you tried option 2 in a sccm enviroment ?</p> <p>could you explain this a bit more:</p> <p>All IP subnets are included in the boundary assignments of the SMS sites in the hierarchy WITH NO OVERLAP </p> <p>= Do you mean that all bounderies are maintained at the central site only</p> <p>Br</p> <p>erik</p>