<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>New Windows Vista virtualization use terms announced</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/keithcombs/archive/2008/01/22/new-windows-vista-virtualization-use-terms-announced.aspx</link><description>For those of you that have been wanting to run versions of Windows Vista in a virtual machine, you are probably aware that up until today, the versions you could run in a licensed fashion were limited.&amp;#160; Well, we have expanded this to include other</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: New Windows Vista virtualization use terms announced</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/keithcombs/archive/2008/01/22/new-windows-vista-virtualization-use-terms-announced.aspx#2783452</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:23:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2783452</guid><dc:creator>TinMan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe this will get me into virtual machines, finally, if it's easy to find and run. I'm using Vista Home Premium, and tried once to use virtual machines, but the XP it came with didn't load...&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>