<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Is there really more to consider to migrating from NT4.0?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/kdubois/archive/2005/02/23/378795.aspx</link><description>While some of you may wonder why I am addressing NT 4.0 migration, others of you are secretly thanking me as you are trying to cnvince the powers that be within your ogranization that the time to migrate is now and that it wont be as difficult or as disruptive</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Is there really more to consider to migrating from NT4.0?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/kdubois/archive/2005/02/23/378795.aspx#378809</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:378809</guid><dc:creator>.</dc:creator><description>This just in... Newsflash..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we migrate from NT4.0 it will NOT be to Windows Server 2003.  HINT :D  Still want us to migrate?</description></item><item><title>re: Is there really more to consider to migrating from NT4.0?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/kdubois/archive/2005/02/23/378795.aspx#378832</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:378832</guid><dc:creator>Peter da Silva</dc:creator><description>If you're migrating from NT4 anyway, why not migrate from NT4 to Samba?</description></item></channel></rss>