<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Microsoft Progress Report: Security</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/kclemson/archive/2004/03/31/104949.aspx</link><description>Bill sent out an e-mail today to a whole bunch of people, and I wanted to highlight some of the Exchange-related parts of it: Exchange Edge Services: This new technology addresses the evolving security problems associated with Internet email. Exchange</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Microsoft Progress Report: Security</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/kclemson/archive/2004/03/31/104949.aspx#105124</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:105124</guid><dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator><description>I think WUS/MS Update is how it should have been from the start.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Im also looking forward to getting my hands on a beta of Exchange edge services (hint hint ;)</description></item><item><title>re: Microsoft Progress Report: Security</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/kclemson/archive/2004/03/31/104949.aspx#105475</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:105475</guid><dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator><description>Also interesting was another blog i read just before this, from jupiter research - &lt;a target="_new" href="http://www.microsoftmonitor.com/archives/002615.html"&gt;http://www.microsoftmonitor.com/archives/002615.html&lt;/a&gt;, where it talks about &amp;quot;different methods of counting&amp;quot;. I wonder if Bill/PR/someone wants to clarify???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and i cant wait for one update service to seamlessly update, without reboots. (ok, not asking much here :) I realise how hard this is to implement)</description></item><item><title>re: Microsoft Progress Report: Security</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/kclemson/archive/2004/03/31/104949.aspx#105668</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 15:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:105668</guid><dc:creator>KC Lemson</dc:creator><description>Matt - that's a good point, it is due to the different classification of security issues. I pinged Mike Howard about this, and he said he will be updating his blog with this info as well: &lt;a target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/michael_howard/"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/michael_howard/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>