<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Apple Dilemma</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jurajl/archive/2009/06/03/the-apple-dilemma.aspx</link><description>Could one imagine a world where Macs comprised 90, 50 or even 30% of all computers? Not really, and here are three reasons. The first reason is structural: Apple has pursued a closed system strategy where software and hardware are tightly coupled and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Either/XOR : The Apple Dilemma | ComputerPortions.Com</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jurajl/archive/2009/06/03/the-apple-dilemma.aspx#3250125</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:09:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3250125</guid><dc:creator>Either/XOR : The Apple Dilemma | ComputerPortions.Com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://computerportions.com/blog/2009/06/eitherxor-the-apple-dilemma/"&gt;http://computerportions.com/blog/2009/06/eitherxor-the-apple-dilemma/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>