<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>John Howard - Senior Program Manager in the Hyper-V team at Microsoft : Blogs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Blogs</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>ADS to deploy Windows XP?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/11/09/414079.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:414079</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/414079.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=414079</wfw:commentRss><description>I have to admit, I'd never thought of this one. Yes, I've looked into using &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/management/ads/default.mspx"&gt;ADS&lt;/A&gt; (Automated Deployment Services) for deploying Windows Server 2003 and use it&amp;nbsp;as part of the Virtual Server Migration Toolkit (&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/evaluation/vsmt.mspx"&gt;VSMT&lt;/A&gt;) solution&amp;nbsp;but never thought of using it to deploy Windows XP. Unsupported it may be, but &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/industry_insiders/archive/2005/11/09/414073.aspx"&gt;Mark&lt;/A&gt; has some great info on how to go about solving some of the problems.&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=414079" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Desktop+Operating+Systems/default.aspx">Desktop Operating Systems</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003/default.aspx">Windows Server 2003</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/How+to+Articles/default.aspx">How to Articles</category></item><item><title>Free Technet Magazine Subscription</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/09/13/410324.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:410324</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/410324.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=410324</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;...but only if you're US based. I know I get readers from all over the world, and know many of you are US based. I'm hoping to follow up with the powers that be to see if we can get some free subscriptions also in the UK too! The &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/"&gt;Technet Magazine&lt;/A&gt;, Microsofts magazine for IT Pro's is going to be beginning a regular publishing schedule from this autumn. If you're also a talented budding author, please also let me know - they're looking for authors covering all subjects including Exchange, Office, Active Directory, IIS, Security,..... and so on. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, don't forget the &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/industry_insiders/"&gt;Industry Insiders blog&lt;/A&gt;. If you haven't seen it, here's your chance to be able to demonstrate your ability in solving real-world problems publicly and on microsoft.com. If you would like to make a contribution, drop &lt;A href="mailto:insideuk@microsoft.com"&gt;me an email&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;for further details.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=410324" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Network+Infrastructure+Systems/default.aspx">Network Infrastructure Systems</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Newsletters/default.aspx">Newsletters</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Misc+Factoids+_2600_+Rambling/default.aspx">Misc Factoids &amp; Rambling</category></item><item><title>Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) Download Link</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/06/13/406260.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406260</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/406260.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=406260</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;While on the &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/06/13/406254.aspx"&gt;subject of patching&lt;/A&gt; &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/updateservices/default.mspx"&gt;here&amp;nbsp;is the home page&lt;/A&gt; for the newly released Windows Server Update Services (WSUS), the next generation of SUS. To find out more about patching, management and securing your networks, have a browse through &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/eileen_brown/archive/2005/06/10/LCS_in_VM.aspx"&gt;Eileens&lt;/A&gt; or &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/steve_lamb/archive/2005/06/10/406206.aspx"&gt;Steves&lt;/A&gt; blog.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;WSUS is a patch and update component of Windows Server which offers an effective and quick way to help you get secure and stay secure. WSUS is an important step towards delivering a core software distribution and update management infrastructure in Windows. WSUS has both server and client components.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Most of your immediate questions about WSUS are answered in the &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/updateservices/evaluation/faqs.mspx"&gt;FAQ site&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=406260" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Desktop+Operating+Systems/default.aspx">Desktop Operating Systems</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Network+Infrastructure+Systems/default.aspx">Network Infrastructure Systems</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003/default.aspx">Windows Server 2003</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Websites/default.aspx">Websites</category></item><item><title>Virtual Server 2005 comparison with Virtual PC 2004 - definitive statement</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/05/25/405381.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 23:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:405381</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/405381.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=405381</wfw:commentRss><description>Now this is worth a read having just found about it internally. &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/megand/archive/2005/05/25/405351.aspx"&gt;Megans whitepaper&lt;/A&gt; which I &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/04/27/404219.aspx"&gt;blogged about recently&lt;/A&gt; is now available in its completed from on microsoft.com. The whitepaper discusses in detail the differences between Virtual PC 2004 and Virtual Server 2005. I know from my own experiences that this is something which many people do not fully understand, not just be those outside of Microsoft, but more often&amp;nbsp;from internal people (who I won't mention my name just to be on the safe side :-)). This paper provides you with all the information you need and can be &lt;A href=" http://download.microsoft.com/download/1/4/d/14d17804-1659-435d-bc11-657a6da308c0/VSvsVPC.doc"&gt;downloaded here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=405381" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Virtual+Server_2C00_+Virtual+PC/default.aspx">Virtual Server, Virtual PC</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Whitepapers/default.aspx">Whitepapers</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Downloads/default.aspx">Downloads</category></item><item><title>Megan Davis - Virtual Server Superstar</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/05/16/404991.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 21:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:404991</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/404991.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=404991</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I blog about Virtual Server a&amp;nbsp;lot (as you may have noticed), but I'm not alone. &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/megand"&gt;Megan Davis&lt;/A&gt; is a technical writer/author at Microsoft who especially focuses on Virtual Server &amp;amp; Virtual PC&amp;nbsp;and is extremely active both &amp;nbsp;internally within Microsoft answering employee questions on discussion groups and the like and externally via her blog and newsgroups. Rather than me regurgitate what Megan has recently blogged about which would hardly be fair (and she did beat me to it:-) ), here's some links which I think will be really useful to you if you're interested in knowing more about Virtual Server. These entries have&amp;nbsp;all posted by Megan over the past few weeks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/megand/archive/2005/05/13/404890.aspx"&gt;Dealing with a VHD that grew too large&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;is about how to compact your hard disks&lt;BR&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/megand/archive/2005/05/12/404883.aspx"&gt;Increasing the size of a VHD&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;is a couple of ways to do exactly what it says in the title&lt;BR&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/megand/archive/2005/04/29/404343.aspx"&gt;How Microsoft is using Virtual Server&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;documents some really cool ways we're using VS to solve solutions internally.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There's lots more up there - have a browse through, I promise&amp;nbsp;you won't be disappointed. Megan, you're a star :-) &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/megand"&gt;Keep up the fantastic work&lt;/A&gt;!!!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=404991" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Virtual+Server_2C00_+Virtual+PC/default.aspx">Virtual Server, Virtual PC</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Websites/default.aspx">Websites</category></item><item><title>Virtual Server Migration Toolkit (VSMT) Guidelines</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/05/06/404561.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 11:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:404561</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/404561.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=404561</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;If you're interested in using &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/evaluation/vsmt.mspx"&gt;VSMT (Virtual Server Migration Toolkit)&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; for migrating a physical machine into a virtual machine, there was a &lt;A href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555306"&gt;new KB article&lt;/A&gt; posted up a few days ago which gives you some general guidelines. Note that there is one error in the article - it currently says it applies to Virtual PC 2004. This is incorrect (and I've submitted feedback). It actually applies to Virtual Server 2005.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you want to see the VSMT steps through a series of &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/category/8894.aspx"&gt;blogcasts&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/01/04/346147.aspx"&gt;have a look here&lt;/A&gt; . Thanks to &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/kevinremde/archive/2005/05/03/404432.aspx "&gt;Kevin&lt;/A&gt; for giving me the link to the KB - it was one which had slipped me by.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=404561" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003/default.aspx">Windows Server 2003</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Virtual+Server_2C00_+Virtual+PC/default.aspx">Virtual Server, Virtual PC</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogcasts/default.aspx">Blogcasts</category></item><item><title>Virtual Server 2005 SCSI Shunt Driver</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/05/03/scsi-shunt-driver.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 08:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:404408</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/404408.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=404408</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;It's rare you see something in a beta release which makes such a dramatic difference&amp;nbsp;to performance. This is one such instance. If you want to save yourself over &lt;EM&gt;5 hours&lt;/EM&gt; when installing a Virtual Machine under Virtual Server 2005, read on....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Last week at home, I was installing a new &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/overview/roadmap.mspx"&gt;Windows Server 2003 R2&lt;/A&gt; beta server configured with single virtual&amp;nbsp;SCSI hard disk under Virtual Server 2005 SP1 beta. This was on my "big" laptop which physically has an IDE disk (don't they all though?).&amp;nbsp;I was getting really frustrated by the length of time it took to install - just&amp;nbsp;under 6&amp;nbsp;hours at 100% CPU throughout. At least I didn't need the heating on that day.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At the time, I hadn't even thought about using the SCSI Shunt Driver floppy which is introduced by Virtual Server 2005 SP1, as my understanding was, as per &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/04/26/412411.aspx"&gt;Ben's blog entry last week&lt;/A&gt;, that it generally only made a difference to users who had physical SCSI hard disks in the host.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To find out the difference the SCSI Shunt Driver floppy made, I repeated the installation once more but using the driver floppy using F6 during the text mode install portion. The difference was staggering: 6 hours down to&amp;nbsp;55 minutes including patching, anti-virusing, defragmenting, pre-compacting, compacting&amp;nbsp;and the installation of VM additions. I was just astonished.&amp;nbsp;That probably means the actual install was more like 40 minutes. Of course, I can't guarantee that you'll necessarily see quite that much difference, but it has to be worth a try next time you're installing a VM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=404408" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003/default.aspx">Windows Server 2003</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Virtual+Server_2C00_+Virtual+PC/default.aspx">Virtual Server, Virtual PC</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Beta+Products/default.aspx">Beta Products</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category></item><item><title>Remote Desktop Assistant 1.0</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/04/28/404282.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 04:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:404282</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/404282.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=404282</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Sometimes the most blindingly obvious and simple utility become a weapon of choice in your toolbox arsenal.&amp;nbsp;Here's one such example I stumbled across a few days ago and am now wondering how I ever coped before. Over on longhornblogs.com, Robert (who I remain indebted to) has put up the &lt;A href="http://longhornblogs.com/robert/archive/2005/04/10/13835.aspx"&gt;Remote Desktop Assistance utility&lt;/A&gt; to make sure your list of remote desktops is up to date. Take a look for yourself - if you use Remote Desktop Connections a lot, this could be&amp;nbsp;the tool of choice for you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://images.interscapeusa.com/blog/remotedesktopassistant.gif"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=404282" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Desktop+Operating+Systems/default.aspx">Desktop Operating Systems</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003/default.aspx">Windows Server 2003</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Downloads/default.aspx">Downloads</category></item><item><title>Do you use blogging software?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/04/19/403864.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:403864</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/403864.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=403864</wfw:commentRss><description>Something which cropped up internally over the past couple of days has been a discussion about how many people at Microsoft must have moved on beyond using the standard HTML interface to their blog engine for posting. I kept quiet at this point once discussions got round to all sorts of software I'd never heard of, not wanting to admin that I still use just the basic interface. It works afterall...... On the assumption that my colleagues won't be reading this, for those who blog regularly, do you use any particular software&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;if so, which one and why? I'm expecially interested to hear from you if the software&amp;nbsp;works with Community Server which is the engine behind blogs.technet.com and also runs under Windows Server 2003.&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=403864" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Desktop+Operating+Systems/default.aspx">Desktop Operating Systems</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003/default.aspx">Windows Server 2003</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category></item><item><title>My blog has moved - please update your links</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/03/30/moving-blog-site.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:403117</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/403117.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=403117</wfw:commentRss><description>Some of you may have noticed recent changes to the blogs.msdn.com site. In case some of you are subscribing to &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jhoward"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/jhoward&lt;/A&gt; to read my blog, or are linking to the blogs.msdn.com/jhoward site, please can you update them to point to &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;instead. Thanks!&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=403117" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Information/default.aspx">Information</category></item><item><title>MSN Messenger 5.1 Tab Functions</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/02/11/371217.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2005 02:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:371217</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/371217.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=371217</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;I just stumbled across Marts blog entry and thought &lt;/font&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.tamtam.nl/mart/PermaLink,guid,4975e36b-4d0c-4507-a8d8-b58b95a4aced.aspx"&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;this was such a cool way &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;to use of the tabbed capability of Windows Messenger 5.1 to embed a view of your Exchange email.&amp;nbsp;Had to share it!&amp;nbsp;Nice one Mart &amp;amp; Stef- great tip.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=371217" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/How+to+Articles/default.aspx">How to Articles</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Misc+Factoids+_2600_+Rambling/default.aspx">Misc Factoids &amp; Rambling</category></item><item><title>PKI and Certificate Management Information in Windows Server 2003</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/02/02/365399.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 22:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:365399</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/365399.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=365399</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;While on the subject of Certificates/Encryption/IPSec/PKI in general yesterday, I was looking around for some good information on how PKI works to post up. One white paper which stuck-out from the pile was published in December last year (so it's reasonably up to date) by David B. Cross and Avi Ben-Menahem entitled "Key Archival and Management in Windows Server 2003". Now this isn't exactly going to be a best seller, but I found it very easy to read and understand, so all kudos to David &amp;amp; Ali. Joking aside, it is crucial to pay consideration to this subject if you are planning to implement or already have implemented a certificate authority within your organisation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;For further info on PKI in general, &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/standard/proddocs/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/standard/proddocs/en-us/SE_PKI.asp?frame=true"&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt; is a good starting point. The home page for Cryptography on Technet is &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/topics/cryptographyetc.mspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and information on EFS (Encrypting File System) in XP and Windows Server 2003 can be found &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/deploy/cryptfs.mspxhttp:/www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/deploy/cryptfs.mspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Otherwise my colleague &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/steve_lamb"&gt;Steve Lamb&lt;/a&gt; will be able fill in the gaps.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=365399" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2000/default.aspx">Windows Server 2000</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Articles/default.aspx">Articles</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/How+to+Articles/default.aspx">How to Articles</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Information/default.aspx">Information</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Publications/default.aspx">Publications</category></item><item><title>MSN Search Launched</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/02/01/364537.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 22:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:364537</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/364537.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=364537</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;Kind of hard to miss the launch party. Well, as it happens I did :-)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even though I'd consciously seen Bill Gates plastered over the home page of both &lt;a href="http://www.msn.com/"&gt;www.msn.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.msn.co.uk/"&gt;www.msn.co.uk&lt;/a&gt; on-and-off all morning, it never dawned on me to read what the story might be about.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;You can find out more from Christopher Payne, Corporate VP for MSN Search on the &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/msnsearch/archive/2005/01/31/364278.aspx"&gt;msnsearch blog&lt;/a&gt;, who cunningly blogged it just before midnight last night.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Links:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;MSN Search: &lt;a href="http://search.msn.com/"&gt;http://search.msn.com&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://search.msn.co.uk/"&gt;http://search.msn.co.uk&lt;/a&gt; for the UK audience.&lt;br /&gt;MSN Search Toolbar: &lt;a href="http://toolbar.msn.com/"&gt;http://toolbar.msn.com&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://toolbar.msn.co.uk/"&gt;http://toolbar.msn.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt; for the UK Audience&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=364537" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Information/default.aspx">Information</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Misc+Factoids+_2600_+Rambling/default.aspx">Misc Factoids &amp; Rambling</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Downloads/default.aspx">Downloads</category></item><item><title>VMRC - simultaneous sessions</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/01/28/362281.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:362281</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/362281.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=362281</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;This is fantastic. I love using the Virtual Machine Remote Console for accessing VMs running under Microsoft Virtual Server 2005, but it never dawned on me until I saw &lt;a href="http://www.peterprovost.org/archive/2005/01/25/2607.aspx"&gt;this blog entry&lt;/a&gt; by Peter Provost, that you could run up two instances of the VMRC client from two different machines to connect to one Virtual Machine "guest". This is great for true remote desktop sharing, which is absolutely not easy to do when connecting through NAT/firewalls/routers etc. And yes, before you ask, I have attempted this with Messenger (and failed).&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;Makes me wish I was doing &lt;a href="http://www.extremeprogramming.org/"&gt;Extreme/Pair Programming (XP)&lt;/a&gt; - this capability is a great enabler. Combine it with IM, VOIP, a WebCam&amp;nbsp;and VPN, you truly can collaborate very effectively from anywhere.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;The other things&amp;nbsp;I particular like about VMRC (apart from being able to access the BIOS space which I &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jhoward/archive/2005/01/19/356384.aspx"&gt;blogged about a few days ago&lt;/a&gt;) is that it's light-weight in terms of screen "real-estate". I find the client in the web-based admin console a bit bloated due to the space taken up by the browser itself. VMRC is minimalist in this respect. Don't forget, you can also maximise the screen with the Host-Key+Enter sequence, so the experience ends up just like a maximised RDP session - except that multiple users can join the party.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;Next stop is to find some sort of analysis comparing the merits of the VMRC, RDP and "Messenger" protocols, all of which provide very similar functionality. Is one any more efficient than the other in terms of compression/throughput? If anyone has any links or info&amp;nbsp;on this, please let me know.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=362281" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Virtual+Server_2C00_+Virtual+PC/default.aspx">Virtual Server, Virtual PC</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Discussions/default.aspx">Discussions</category></item><item><title>Blogcast on Channel9 - the name is here to stay!</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/01/18/355581.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:355581</guid><dc:creator>jhoward</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/comments/355581.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/commentrss.aspx?PostID=355581</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;How cool is this - &lt;a href="http://scoble.weblogs.com/"&gt;Robert Scoble&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;just posted up on &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=36287"&gt;channel 9 about Blogcasting&lt;/a&gt;. My colleague Eileen has already recorded couple of blogcasts - for example &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/eileen_brown/archive/2004/12/09/278983.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and I've done a series of &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jhoward/archive/2005/01/08/349166.aspx"&gt;blogcasts to explain about VSMT&lt;/a&gt; - there's lots more in the pipeline especially from the UK IT Pro team, so stay tuned!&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2"&gt;There's been a lot of contention over the name blogcast, but it looks like it's here to stay..... A blogcast differs from a podcast in that it is audio &lt;b&gt;plus&lt;/b&gt; video.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=355581" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogs/default.aspx">Blogs</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/tags/Blogcasts/default.aspx">Blogcasts</category></item></channel></rss>