http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2006/05/28/windows-server-virtualization-is-it-a-product-no-it-s-part-of-an-os.aspxA very frequently asked question internally. Hence I'm sure this must be as confusing, if not more so outside Microsoft. Many people seem incorrectly to think that Windows Server virtualization is the next version of Virtual Server 2005 R2. This is incorrect.en-GBCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2006/05/28/windows-server-virtualization-is-it-a-product-no-it-s-part-of-an-os.aspx#430744Mon, 29 May 2006 08:01:08 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:430744Keith CombsNow if I can just find a 64bit laptop with 32gig of memory... then we could have some real fun. &nbsp;:)http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2006/05/28/windows-server-virtualization-is-it-a-product-no-it-s-part-of-an-os.aspx#430750Mon, 29 May 2006 08:40:33 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:430750Toens BuekerI tend to think of Windows Server Virtualization as something similar to Xen. If you know where Xen sits in the software stack, you now where Windows Server Virtualization sits.http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2006/05/28/windows-server-virtualization-is-it-a-product-no-it-s-part-of-an-os.aspx#431066Tue, 30 May 2006 20:33:32 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:431066IT NewsFrom John Howard blog: <br>&amp;quot;A very frequently asked question internally. Hence I'm sure this must be as...