<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Virtual Server 2005 comparison with Virtual PC 2004</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/04/27/404219.aspx</link><description>I am currently updating my slidedeck for the webcast I'm doing this Friday on Virtual Server bringing it up to date in terms of the recent MMS (Microsoft Management Summit) announcements. I got to the slides comparing the differences between the Virtual</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Virtual Server 2005 comparison with Virtual PC 2004</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/04/27/404219.aspx#404299</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 01:04:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:404299</guid><dc:creator>megand</dc:creator><description>Of course, John. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Megan</description></item><item><title>Virtual Server 2005 comparison with Virtual PC 2004 - difinitive statement</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2005/04/27/404219.aspx#405383</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 23:46:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:405383</guid><dc:creator>John Howard</dc:creator><description>Now this is worth a read having just found about it internally. Megans whitepaper which I blogged about...</description></item></channel></rss>