<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Turning a Unix App into a Web Service using SFU and .NET - Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jdzions/archive/2004/01/17/59825.aspx</link><description>For the last couple of years, the SFU and MSUM teams have shown a demo that takes a Unix application, ports it to Windows using Services For Unix, then turns the app into a COM server and into a Web Service. I've been trying to find the time to write</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>The Information Worker, SOA and InfoPath</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jdzions/archive/2004/01/17/59825.aspx#59915</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2004 20:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:59915</guid><dc:creator>Drewby</dc:creator><description>Today, the hype is all around social software, new more fluid approaches to workflow, and collaboration. Making ourselves as groups and organizations more efficient. The information workers, as we call them now, are not islands. They are linked with each other in vast human communication networks. How are we doing it? By simplifying the interfaces we have with each other to increase the number and effectiveness of our links. I see some similarities between this approach to human collaboration an</description></item></channel></rss>