<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why does DPM 2007 use the Recovery Storage Group for Exchange?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jbuff/archive/2008/06/05/why-does-dpm-2007-use-the-recovery-storage-group-for-exchange.aspx</link><description>&amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; &amp;#160; Hello friends, Just posted over on the DPM Product Team blog on this -- including discussion points on: -- How Microsoft customers were protecting Exchange previously -- Design goals and feature decisions for DPM 2007 -- Supportability</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator></channel></rss>