<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Infrastructure Optimisation (IO): The Foundations of Dynamic IT</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jasons/archive/2008/12/17/infrastructure-optimisation-io-the-foundations-of-dynamic-it.aspx</link><description>Many organisations today realise the value of technology in driving business differentiation. A lot of the time technology is imperative to increase and improve business performance in today's enterprise environments and thus become a true corporate asset</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Infrastructure Optimisation (IO): The Foundations of Dynamic IT</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jasons/archive/2008/12/17/infrastructure-optimisation-io-the-foundations-of-dynamic-it.aspx#3178023</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:12:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3178023</guid><dc:creator>Richard Griffith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good work. I would like to see the components of the &amp;quot;ID and Access management&amp;quot; layer of the “Core Infrastructure Optimization Model” mapped to a set of services (eg Active Directory, DNS etc) for the rationalized &amp;amp; dynamic levels. This in turn can be mapped to a set of physical servers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This could lead to providing a set of 'patterns' to choose from when deploying Windows based infrastructure into different scenarios (eg organisation size, geographic distribution and required maturity level)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>