<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>How not to be read...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jamesone/archive/2007/07/20/how-not-to-be-read.aspx</link><description>Eileen asks " So how do I get my team to read my emails ? " Actually, she overlooks something very simple and important. Rule one: the nearer the author is to the reader in the company hierarchy the more likely the message will be read. If someone at</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: How not to be read...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jamesone/archive/2007/07/20/how-not-to-be-read.aspx#1576885</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:55:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1576885</guid><dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One other tip for not being getting your message across:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you want to maximize information loss, say two unrelated things in the same message. &amp;nbsp;Want to have a party where no one comes? &amp;nbsp;Easy, send a message entitled &amp;quot;Out of Town!&amp;quot; and then say &amp;quot;I'll be out of town for the next two weeks. &amp;nbsp;I get back on the 27th. &amp;nbsp;When I get back, we'll have a big party at my place.&amp;quot;. Most readers will read/think &amp;quot;Out of town, yeah, I know, yadda yadda&amp;quot; and skip the rest. &amp;nbsp;Make your email message about just one thing. &amp;nbsp;If you want to say two things send two messages. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unless, that is, its your Christmas update letter to your relatives and they're hanging on your every word.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why I am the one doing this ?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jamesone/archive/2007/07/20/how-not-to-be-read.aspx#1593946</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:51:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1593946</guid><dc:creator>James O'Neill's blog </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A draft post which ended up going on the spike referred to Lyn Truss's book &amp;quot;Talk to the Hand: the utter&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: How not to be read...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jamesone/archive/2007/07/20/how-not-to-be-read.aspx#1620091</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:20:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1620091</guid><dc:creator>AdamV</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A really useful post. More soft-skills for the techies to master.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I find if I am writing an email for consumption by end-users (eg about a planned server downtime) I think very hard about how to write it in the least ambiguous way. For this specific type of email to be read and understood:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Avoid any misunderstanding about when - &amp;quot;tomorrow, Tuesday the 7th of October at 7 pm BST...&amp;quot; (tomorrow / today etc are too easily misunderstood when read at the 'wrong' time)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tell them what is affected (but also confirm what is not) - &amp;quot;Email will be unavailable through Outlook, web access or mobile / PDAs. All other services are available including file access, printing, apple scrumping and caber tossing&amp;quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If relevant, include &amp;quot;where&amp;quot; facts as well - people sometimes can't grasp that the email server being turned off at head office also affects them in their regional location (or conversely that it does not, if they have a local server - how are they to know the infrastructure you have in place?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Highlight all the most important facts in bold to assist the skim readers - not shouty capitals nor colour which may not be visible on all devices or printers (for the 5% of people who feel the need to print it for reference).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use an expiry date on the email so it can be ignored by anyone returning to work after the event.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A [non-IT] colleague once asked why I put in so much detail in these emails. I pointed out that half an hour before, someone had asked me why I did not put in more information, and than no matter how much or little I always had at least one person asking something which was either plainly stated or easily inferred (&amp;quot;So after you turn off the email server for half an hour on Saturday, will I still be able to save files on Monday morning?&amp;quot;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no perfect way to keep everyone happy, just ways to inform as many as possible and deal with as few queries as possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>On Writing. And formats for storing writing. Via sockpuppets</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jamesone/archive/2007/07/20/how-not-to-be-read.aspx#1722942</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:11:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1722942</guid><dc:creator>James O'Neill's blog </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I mentioned the post that I lost last night and that it referred to Clive James, a writer whose words&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Quality assurance Vs Quality improvement. Which thinking do you want ?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/jamesone/archive/2007/07/20/how-not-to-be-read.aspx#1776033</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:15:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1776033</guid><dc:creator>James O'Neill's blog </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the Microsoft internal discussion lists has had an interesting thread over the last couple of&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>