<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>New York Times Reader in Silverlight on a Mac</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/james/archive/2007/05/16/new-york-times-reader-in-silverlight-on-a-mac.aspx</link><description>Shock horror, but here's some innovation from Microsoft ( back story from comments in this post ). The New York Times Reader which was originally a Vista launch app based on WPF has been ported to Silverlight on the Mac. Now because WPF and Silverlight</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: New York Times Reader in Silverlight on a Mac</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/james/archive/2007/05/16/new-york-times-reader-in-silverlight-on-a-mac.aspx#3060097</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:15:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3060097</guid><dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Innovation? Maybe if this was 2002. How about an Adobe &amp;quot;me too&amp;quot; flash copy. Yet another lame attempt to hold web content hostage to proprietary Microsoft software. It reminds me of the ActiveX days where one NEEDED Internet Explorer and ActiveX to view sites. Thankfully those days are over. &amp;nbsp;The planet smartened up and realized it doesn't need Microsoft or its software to use the Internet, and certainly not on a Mac or Linux. Don't believe me? Why don't you surf on over and read some of the reactions on the NY Times site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.S. And to answer your next question. It's different, because Adobe is not a convicted monopolist with a history of trying to extinguish everything else.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>