<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Softgrid Licensing Implications</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/james/archive/2007/12/05/softgrid-licensing-implications.aspx</link><description>Another one of the questions I was probed with at a Windows Server 2008 event the other was about licensing implications of using Softgrid Application Virtualisation do stream software to the user's PC. There were some concerns that you would need multiple</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Do you need multiple app licenses for applications running under Softgrid?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/james/archive/2007/12/05/softgrid-licensing-implications.aspx#2620579</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:36:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2620579</guid><dc:creator>Rod Trent at myITforum.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Softgrid Licensing Implications&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>