<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ISA Server Troubleshooting; Layer 1</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2006/10/14/isa-server-troubleshooting-layer-1.aspx</link><description>I completed a session with an ISA user yesterday that reminded me just how few ISA problems really are problems with ISA Server itself. Network device configuration, name resolution, malware, etc. are all non-ISA considerations that can adversely affect</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: ISA Server Troubleshooting; Layer 1</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2006/10/14/isa-server-troubleshooting-layer-1.aspx#468955</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:35:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:468955</guid><dc:creator>Joe Blow</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Not quite right. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hard setting gig-e over copper will break things, badly. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See IEEE standard 802.3z Standard clause 37 for further details. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jb&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: ISA Server Troubleshooting; Layer 1</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2006/10/14/isa-server-troubleshooting-layer-1.aspx#469510</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:10:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:469510</guid><dc:creator>isablog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanx, Joe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You're correct that this may not work every time (device &amp;quot;compatablility&amp;quot;, more often than not), but my (and quite a few others') experience has demonstrated otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I run two separate Gig-E copper lab networks and every device that is capable of it operates static G/full. &amp;nbsp;In fact, the connection with the upstream router is also static G/full. &amp;nbsp;All this runs with no problems at L1. &amp;nbsp;Yes; where we have a 100 MbpS device operating, we &amp;quot;dumb down&amp;quot; the switch port, but I've never been forced to use &amp;quot;auto&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will amend my posting to include &amp;quot;you need to test your configuration&amp;quot;, since incompatabilities between devices are the greatest limiting factor.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: ISA Server Troubleshooting; Layer 1</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2006/10/14/isa-server-troubleshooting-layer-1.aspx#890309</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 03:27:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:890309</guid><dc:creator>DFW Server Support</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You mentioned above that &amp;quot;If a switch port is configured for 100 Mbps and the connected NIC is configured for 10 MbpS (or vice versa), they’ll won’t communicate at all, even though you may have a “connected” light and see “activity blinkies” on the port &amp;amp; adapter indicators.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe they will still connnected, however the speed will just be slowed down considerably. &amp;nbsp;I know this from experience because I have had many routers and switches that have had ports go bad. &amp;nbsp;When this happens the router generally will still send the data at 10mbps. &amp;nbsp;So I am not sure if that is correct. &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.texanit.com"&gt;http://www.texanit.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: ISA Server Troubleshooting; Layer 1</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2006/10/14/isa-server-troubleshooting-layer-1.aspx#3252235</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:06:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3252235</guid><dc:creator>FLV to MP3 Mac</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt; Yes; where we have a 100 MbpS device operating&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>