<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Mythbusters #2: Stanford has more IP addresses than China</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/ipv6/archive/2007/05/14/mythbusters-2-stanford-has-more-ip-addresses-than-china.aspx</link><description>Let's tackle our second myth. There is a factoid on the Internet that some American universities (normally listed as either Stanford or MIT) have more IP addresses than the entire country of China. This has been repeated in the mainstream press so often</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Mythbusters #2: Stanford has more IP addresses than China</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/ipv6/archive/2007/05/14/mythbusters-2-stanford-has-more-ip-addresses-than-china.aspx#1105563</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 21:45:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1105563</guid><dc:creator>sil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Technically they could have 2,148,270,080 working addresses if they're using PAT. So yes they'd have more in one occassion. Same for China, 9*16,777,216*65536 ... Want to further divide... Segment those PAT's into routers and re-PAT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_address_translation"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_address_translation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>