<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Gartner: Open XML “would have been a better choice than ODF as the single standard”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/gray_knowlton/archive/2008/11/20/gartner-open-xml-would-have-been-a-better-choice-than-odf-as-the-single-standard.aspx</link><description>Gartner has published a report about document format standards . They have pointed out a number of key challenges related to document format standards, and illustrate clearly some of the issues that remain from the Open XML and ODF ratification waves.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Gartner: Open XML “would have been a better choice than ODF as the single standard”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/gray_knowlton/archive/2008/11/20/gartner-open-xml-would-have-been-a-better-choice-than-odf-as-the-single-standard.aspx#3157450</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:02:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3157450</guid><dc:creator>StefanWord2k</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there are even issues of interoperability within Open XML. Most important questions for customers going to use Office 2007 are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. How interoperable will the current Office 2007 Open XML formats be with the new ISO Office Open XML formats?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. For how many years will the current Office 2007 Open XML formats be readable and fully supported in Microsoft's new Office Editions?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please let us know, so we have a base to decide whether it's a good idea to switch over from legacy formats to Office 2007 Open XML formats or if it's more advisable to wait for the implementation of ISO Open XML.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>[Open XML] Les liens de la semaine 17/11/08 et autres infos en vrac</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/gray_knowlton/archive/2008/11/20/gartner-open-xml-would-have-been-a-better-choice-than-odf-as-the-single-standard.aspx#3157532</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:39:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3157532</guid><dc:creator>Julien Chable</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Comme &amp;#224; l'accoutum&amp;#233;, voici une brochettes de liens de la semaine sur Open XML. Posts techniques en vrac&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Gartner: Open XML “would have been a better choice than ODF as the single standard”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/gray_knowlton/archive/2008/11/20/gartner-open-xml-would-have-been-a-better-choice-than-odf-as-the-single-standard.aspx#3157678</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:29:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3157678</guid><dc:creator>Xeibo@gmail.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft (Ok, not MS but an analyst firm funded by MS) releases a study about how OOXML is better than ODF... &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hmnn are we back to February or something? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, why are you using the misleading &amp;quot;Open XML&amp;quot; tag? IT is NOT Open XML , it is &amp;quot;Office open XML&amp;quot; while in reality it means &amp;quot;optionally-open xml&amp;quot;, please don't mislead like that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Gartner: Open XML “would have been a better choice than ODF as the single standard”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/gray_knowlton/archive/2008/11/20/gartner-open-xml-would-have-been-a-better-choice-than-odf-as-the-single-standard.aspx#3157688</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:24:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3157688</guid><dc:creator>Gray Knowlton</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Xeibo@gmail.com,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We did not fund this report.&amp;nbsp;This is a Gartner Research note, one of many that they create and publish. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But I agree, it is pretty sad when people show up on my blog trying to smear the formats or smear people who make comments about them. I thought we were past that as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Gartner: Open XML “would have been a better choice than ODF as the single standard”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/gray_knowlton/archive/2008/11/20/gartner-open-xml-would-have-been-a-better-choice-than-odf-as-the-single-standard.aspx#3162362</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:46:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3162362</guid><dc:creator>Jesper Lund Stocholm</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Gray,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did Microsoft or Gartner decide to prevent print-out of the document?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(and could you please see to that it is &amp;quot;undone&amp;quot;?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;:o)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;/Jesper&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Gartner: Open XML “would have been a better choice than ODF as the single standard”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/gray_knowlton/archive/2008/11/20/gartner-open-xml-would-have-been-a-better-choice-than-odf-as-the-single-standard.aspx#3162712</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 07:58:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3162712</guid><dc:creator>Gray Knowlton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Gartner is in control of these rights, not me. Unfortunately there isn't anything for me to do about this apart from asking you to save a tree :).&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Gartner: Open XML “would have been a better choice than ODF as the single standard”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/gray_knowlton/archive/2008/11/20/gartner-open-xml-would-have-been-a-better-choice-than-odf-as-the-single-standard.aspx#3162729</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:34:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3162729</guid><dc:creator>Jesper Lund Stocholm</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Gray,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, it must be one of those occasions where you are f***** either way. Given a choice between saving a tree and the added CarbonDioxide-emission from reading it on my laptop (and the extra weight in the bus from the added 6 lbs) I'm not really sure what to pick.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;:o)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>