<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Update on multi-engine scanning comparison</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/forefront/archive/2007/11/07/update-on-multi-engine-scanning-comparison.aspx</link><description>We have updated numbers from last month’s comparison of single-AV engines versus the multi-engine approach used by Forefront Security for Exchange Server and Forefront Security for SharePoint . These tests were run over the summer, also by AV-Test.org,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>   Multi-engine scanning comparison &amp;raquo; D&amp;#8217; Technology Weblog: Technology, Blogging, Tips, Tricks, Computer, Hardware, Software, Tutorials, Internet, Web, Gadgets, Fashion, LifeStyle, Entertainment, News and more.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/forefront/archive/2007/11/07/update-on-multi-engine-scanning-comparison.aspx#2360154</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:49:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2360154</guid><dc:creator>   Multi-engine scanning comparison » D’ Technology Weblog: Technology, Blogging, Tips, Tricks, Computer, Hardware, Software, Tutorials, Internet, Web, Gadgets, Fashion, LifeStyle, Entertainment, News and more.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.ditii.com/2007/11/07/multi-engine-scanning-comparison/"&gt;http://www.ditii.com/2007/11/07/multi-engine-scanning-comparison/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>