WSUS 3.0 (What's new)

What's new in WSUS 3.0?

PatchAholic...The WSUS Blog! — Sun, 07 May 2006 13:35:59 GMT

What's new in WSUS 3.0?

re: WSUS 3.0 (What's new)

Athif - PatchAholic — Sun, 07 May 2006 13:38:38 GMT

Thanks a lot for the update:-)

Athif,
PatchAholic...The WSUS Blog!
http://msmvps.com/blogs/athif/

re: WSUS 3.0 (What's new)

Eric — Wed, 10 May 2006 17:16:53 GMT

I'm hearing rumor from those that attended MMS 2006 that it will only be available via SMS. Since it's going to an MMC app, I would think that it could still be stand-alone.

Please confirm one way or another.

re: WSUS 3.0 (What's new)

Jason Downey — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:18:19 GMT

I would like to have the ability to manually push updates(button)for serves and have the confidence they are going to install right away. Reason being, I have a limited amount of time for the update to complete, then within that time I need to be able to get the server back up if something does go awry. Currently planning on just using WSUS for detecting updates on test servers, with HFNetChk for the actual push after testing.

re: WSUS 3.0 (What's new)

daniel vanmeter — Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:51:56 GMT

a backup server option would be nice on the client. If the computer could not contact a primary wsus then have a secondary. The secondary could be one of yours or even to microsoft. We have a lot of laptops that go on the road. Some may VPN and get updates, but others may only VPN for a hour and miss the update interval, or even not use VPN to connect to the WSUS server for a long period of time. This leaves computers in an unpatched state and vulnerable. The secondary going to microsoft could be optional since some people dont want patches pushed unless approved. I could see even secondary wsus server as a failover being quite handy

re: WSUS 3.0 (What's new)

manu — Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:15:52 GMT

WSUS 3.0

http://blogs.technet.com/fabricem_blogs/archive/2006/05/06/427461.aspx