<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>msExchESEParamLogBuffers Storage Group Attribute</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/03/10/421742.aspx</link><description>The msExchESEParamLogBuffers storage group attribute governs the number of Extensible Storage Engine (ESE) log buffers that are used by the Exchange information store. ESE uses a set of log buffers to hold information in RAM before it writes to the transaction</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Weekend reading</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/03/10/421742.aspx#421814</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:15:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:421814</guid><dc:creator>subject: exchange</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Research In Motion and NTP Sign Definitive Settlement Agreement to End Litigation &lt;br&gt;RIM Announces Availability...</description></item><item><title>What to include in a default build?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/03/10/421742.aspx#421919</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:54:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:421919</guid><dc:creator>Teo Heras</dc:creator><description>Two part question:&lt;br&gt;1. Based on your comment &amp;quot;Another good reason for the increase (and why it should be done for a configuration step as part of a server install).&amp;quot; Should this configuration be included when building a new server. &amp;nbsp;One that will hold 4,000 mailboxes for example? &amp;nbsp;Or, should we only add it if we see log stalling behaviour when we run JetStress to validate the storage? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. &amp;nbsp;As long as we're on the subject of cache sizes, what about the value of msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax. &amp;nbsp;In articles I've read, this value should not be changed in Exchange 2000 unless there are performance issues. &amp;nbsp;With Exchange 2003 this value appears to be a standard configuration on servers with more than 3GB of memory and should be set to 311296.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Teo&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>