<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx</link><description>A frequent topic of discussion with customers is the future of Public Folders, thus I think it would be good to capture that discussion on our blog. In summary: Public Folders are widely used by our customers for sharing document, calendar, contact, and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420002</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:52:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420002</guid><dc:creator>christiankelly</dc:creator><description>I think one thing that is majorly overlooked by the WSS team, is the &amp;quot;replication across geographically distributed sites&amp;quot;. I use public folders for this purpose alone, and though I like WSS, there is no way to use it over slow links, and no good way to replicate the data. I hope that whenever exchange drops support for PF, that the WSS team adds replication to the product, or else customers will be stuck.</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420004</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:02:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420004</guid><dc:creator>Paul Robichaux</dc:creator><description>Given that PFs will be officially supported until at least 2016, I think it's a safe bet that the SharePoint folks will provide a distributed multi-master replication facility sometime before PFs fade off into the sunset. My experience has generally been that many of the organizations now using PFs have lots of PF content that they don't need and aren't using, so PF cleanup is always one of the first things included in any supportability review I perform for customers. </description></item><item><title>Understanding Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420016</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:34:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420016</guid><dc:creator>The Official SBS Support Blog</dc:creator><description>Terry Meyerson of the Exchange team clears up a lot of misconceptions about Exchange Public folders and...</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420028</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:44:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420028</guid><dc:creator>Nathan Yelton</dc:creator><description>First, I noticed that you're still calling the product E12, and that it wasn't announced as part of Office 2007 last week. &amp;nbsp;Does this mean it's not a part of Office anymore (again)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, two things we also use public folders for here in addition to sharing messages with a workgroup:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Shared/generic e-mail addresses that we don't want to set up as a distribution list. &amp;nbsp;It seems like creating a public folder has lower overhead than maintaining a separate user account for a generic mailbox.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Easy way to move e-mail messages between users when a user is retiring or taking a new position. Before they leave, they can move any e-mails they wish to pass along to a public folder, and the new employee can claim them and move them back to their inbox.</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420031</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:58:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420031</guid><dc:creator>K. Jung</dc:creator><description>We use public folders for Scripts (Events.exe)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will our scritps work whith Exchange 12?</description></item><item><title>FYI: The Future of Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420036</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:14:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420036</guid><dc:creator>The CDOs and CDONTS of Messaging Development</dc:creator><description>The Exchange Team has a great new post on the future of Public Folders in Exchange 12 and understanding...</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420046</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:14:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420046</guid><dc:creator>Dan Smith</dc:creator><description>Mail-enabled public folders are often used as shared group mailboxes, centralized fax mailboxes, and a variety of other group collaboration needs in which direct SMTP support is necessary. &amp;nbsp;I haven't seen any promise that WSS will provide the capability of a shared mail-enabled repository in which permissions can be controlled as easily as public folders can.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are there plans to allow SharePoint to offer the simplicity and flexibility of mail-enabled public folders?&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Exchange 12 и механизм Public Folders [Терри Майерсон]</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420048</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:59:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420048</guid><dc:creator>Олег Михайлик</dc:creator><description>Многие серьёзные компании хранят документы в Exchange. Но внутреннее устройство </description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420121</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:12:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420121</guid><dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator><description>Will E12 integrate with Groove Server?</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420131</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:20:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420131</guid><dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator><description>My customer is providing accessing to public folder for non-Microsoft clients through NNTP under Exchange 2003&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will this still work ?</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420134</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:13:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420134</guid><dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator><description>As many above I also have concerns about mail enabled public folders. &amp;nbsp;We use a number of them as shared generic accounts such as info@domain.com etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My other question is about &amp;quot;Free/busy lookups through the new E12 availability web service&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Can you elaborate more on this? &amp;nbsp;Will this be based on the CalDAV standard?</description></item><item><title>Exchange 12: Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420142</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:14:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420142</guid><dc:creator>Martin Pavlis - pavlis.net</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420143</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:53:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420143</guid><dc:creator>michael</dc:creator><description>I also want to register my concern about mail enabled public folder. We use them, and as a Gold Partner we have advised our clients to use them as they simplify management of info@domain.com mailboxes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another common use for our organization and our customers is centralizing external contacts into a public folder. This works extremely well, as that contact folder can be setup as an Outlook Address Book. Although I understand that contact folders can be handled in WSS v3, what about making that contact folder in WSS v3 an Outlook Address Book.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you can provide a simple migration roadmap for these two issues, you will make adoption of Outook 2007 and E12 that much easier for many organizations!</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420152</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 03:35:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420152</guid><dc:creator>Exchange</dc:creator><description>K. Jung,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To answer your question - the EVENTS.EXE aka Events Service is gone from Exchange 12. This service was &amp;quot;de-emphasized&amp;quot; in Exchange 2000/2003 releases (meaning - it was included to allow time to migrate Event Service scripts to other solutions).</description></item><item><title>The future of Public Folders in Exchange Server</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420162</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:38:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420162</guid><dc:creator>Blog's AndersonPatricio.org</dc:creator><description>Hello Everybody,&lt;br&gt;Terry Myerson wrote about the future of Public Folder in Exchange Server. The text...</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420193</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:16:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420193</guid><dc:creator>PermanentMarker</dc:creator><description>I don't understand why MS is so driven to a future that a lot of people like. I want to have that sportcar in red, but it will soon be available only in bleu because we don't want to sell red ones anyomre.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see many organizations making use of PF's even beside Sharepoint. Because it's handy simple inside your mailbox and its a simple folderstructure, and they are free how to use it. For example lot of companies use it to collect emails for example info@company.com share it and it's available. The nice thing about it, is the simplicity easy fast solutions. installing another Backoffice product for those simple tasks is often overkill&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well in the end besicly it's just simple mail, and there are a lot of sportcar brands, when people look at cars they buy the ones with the most gadgets (wrong, that are the people who buy computers), car buyers prefer red sportcars</description></item><item><title>Weekend reading</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420494</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:56:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420494</guid><dc:creator>subject: exchange</dc:creator><description>Hurray, 2 week vacation starting today&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;;-) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How to enforce Microsoft Outlook cached mode via...</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420547</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 12:38:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420547</guid><dc:creator>Yegurnov Sergey</dc:creator><description>Well, maybe this post is just a bit out of scope, but still about Exchange 12. First of all, exchange dev. roadmap seems to be really nice. IMHO, E2k/E2k3 has too many different management technologies... But the best news about Ex12 is management based on Monad. Here is my question: where can I find more technical information on Monad&amp;amp;Exchange? For example, which cmdlets will be available? Will Ex12 include namespace providers(for example, AD provider)? And how is GUI interacting with Monad? Does it use Cmdlets directly or via Monad hosting? If via hosting, could it be possible to view GUI-generated Monad scripts? I undestand, of course, this stuff would be in Ex12 SDK, but maybe you have some information to share now? In general, it would be great to see more blog posts about Monad&amp;amp;Exchange.</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420564</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 02:53:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420564</guid><dc:creator>Wayne Small</dc:creator><description>I love it that you will support this for 10 years. &amp;nbsp;However I have a concern that you will withdraw support for features before that 10 year period. &amp;nbsp;Point in question - during the launch of Exchange 2000, much ado was made about the IFS and how you can now put information directly into the Exchange store. &amp;nbsp;My company built an Intranet solution for a client based on this technology which worked fine - even on Exchange 2003 - until that is Office 2003 SP1 - this &amp;quot;broke&amp;quot; their ability to save information to the data store. &amp;nbsp;MS response is &amp;quot;oh that's no longer supported&amp;quot;... Hence the need to redesign the application at the cost to the customer. &amp;nbsp;Therefore I take the &amp;quot;10 year support&amp;quot; cycle very cynically.</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420708</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:10:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420708</guid><dc:creator>Nick Gillott</dc:creator><description>IMAP and OWA don't fully play with PFs in E12. So what happens to the Entourage clients? Can they no longer use PFs?</description></item><item><title>Keli Exchange 12 niuansai, kuriuos būtina žinoti jau dabar</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#420805</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:07:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420805</guid><dc:creator>IT specialisto užrašai</dc:creator><description>Kokią kompiuterių įrangą turėčiau įsigyti, jeigu jau dabar noriu naudoti Exchange Server 2003, bet tikiuosi iškart migruoti į Exchange 12 vos tik jam pasirodžius? Ar draugaus naujasis Exchange 12 su Public Folders technologija?</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#421384</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:55:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:421384</guid><dc:creator>Glen Martin</dc:creator><description>No IMAP or OWA access to Public Folders in E12? This is not a good thing. It is bad enough that our Mac user base is screwed regarding freedocs in Public Folders, but under E12 they'll have NO access?</description></item><item><title>Collaborative Applications</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#421420</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:48:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:421420</guid><dc:creator>SharePoint Team Blog</dc:creator><description>Since we often get asked about building collaborative applications, I thought I would highlight a few...</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#421461</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:55:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:421461</guid><dc:creator>Ronny Ong</dc:creator><description>I'd like to join the voices of those disappointed in the lack of IMAP and OWA support for E12 Public Folders. I think it's horribly misleading to suggest that Public Folders AS WE KNOW THEM TODAY will be supported beyond the EOL of Exchange 2003. It sounds to me like Public Folders are being reluctantly retained for the sole purpose of appeasing the Outlook user population, without regard to the rest of the Exchange customer base. This only reinforces the industry misconceptions of Exchange being a closed, proprietary platform with poor interoperability options. Please...if you can't RTM with IMAP and OWA support for E12 Public Folders, then at least keep them on the list to catch for SP1.</description></item><item><title>Les dossiers publics existent-ils toujours dans Exchange 12 ?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#422362</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:45:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:422362</guid><dc:creator>Briefing Grands Comptes Microsoft 2006</dc:creator><description>Comme donn&amp;amp;#233;e lors du BGC, la r&amp;amp;#233;ponse est oui et heureusement... &lt;br&gt;Les Dossiers Publics seront support&amp;amp;#233;s...</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#424271</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:25:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:424271</guid><dc:creator>parol</dc:creator><description>Kjempe kuuuul hjemmeside du har.</description></item><item><title>Vlad Mazek&amp;#8217;s IT Blog  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Unifying E12, De-emphasizing and Mindreading.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#425390</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 03:47:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:425390</guid><dc:creator>Vlad Mazek’s IT Blog  » Blog Archive   » Unifying E12, De-emphasizing and Mindreading.</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.vladville.com/2006/02/unifying-e12-de-emphasizing-and-mindreading.html"&gt;http://www.vladville.com/2006/02/unifying-e12-de-emphasizing-and-mindreading.html&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>SNAFU  &amp;raquo; Speculation</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#426040</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:30:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:426040</guid><dc:creator>SNAFU  » Speculation</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://reuben.honigwachs.de/blog/?p=82"&gt;http://reuben.honigwachs.de/blog/?p=82&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>E12 - What's in and what's not...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#426136</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:24:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:426136</guid><dc:creator>Brettjo :: Microsoft Exchange Messaging</dc:creator><description>I wanted to give you an intial heads up as to what to expect in E12 this post is just a very high level...</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 12 and Public Folders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/02/20/419994.aspx#426754</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:38:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:426754</guid><dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator><description>Already looking forward to using the availability web service you mention. OWA not supporting public folders, is there a technical explanation for this change?</description></item></channel></rss>