<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Exchange 2003 SP2 Database Header changes</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/08/29/409959.aspx</link><description>Before Exchange 2003 SP2, database file headers did not contain any information about number of ECC fix-ups (which was an Exchange 2003 SP1 feature). Additionally, there was no way of telling how many corrections were made when specific database file</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Exchange 2003 SP2 Database Header changes</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/08/29/409959.aspx#409983</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:26:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:409983</guid><dc:creator>Martin Pavlis - pavlis.net</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Exchange 2003 SP2 Database Header changes</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/08/29/409959.aspx#409986</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:06:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:409986</guid><dc:creator>Andy David</dc:creator><description>Does this mean that you can not run SP1 eseutil against a SP2 store?&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Weekend reading</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/08/29/409959.aspx#410163</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:00:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:410163</guid><dc:creator>subject: exchange</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Weekend reading</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/08/29/409959.aspx#410208</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:43:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:410208</guid><dc:creator>subject: exchange</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Exchange 2003 SP2 Database Header changes</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/08/29/409959.aspx#410217</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2005 00:44:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:410217</guid><dc:creator>Exchange</dc:creator><description>Andy,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope - there should be no problems using eseutil from SP1 and those new DB fields. I'm not sure why you'd want to do that though, unless there was a very specific article or a situation that would require it?</description></item><item><title>Exchange, Windows, SPS, LCS, Live Meeting, Security, MIIS, Misc.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/08/29/409959.aspx#410745</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:55:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:410745</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Clustering </dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Exchange 2003 SP2 Database Header changes</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/08/29/409959.aspx#410786</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:05:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:410786</guid><dc:creator>Andy David</dc:creator><description>Thanks Nino, Naw, more out of curiosity than anything. :) &lt;br&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>