<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Exchange ActiveSync and the /Exchange virtual directory</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx</link><description>As many of you already know, Exchange ActiveSync uses HTTP-DAV to access the user’s mailbox. By default these HTTP requests are all sent to the /Exchange virtual directory on the mailbox server. However, in certain deployments like the hosting scenario</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Exchange ActiveSync and the /Exchange virtual directory</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407073</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 03:04:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407073</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Mateos</dc:creator><description>Really nice !&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A much needed feature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks.</description></item><item><title>Exchange ActiveSync and the /Exchange virtual directory</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407076</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:45:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407076</guid><dc:creator>ExchangeIS</dc:creator><description>Great information about the way Exchange ActiveSync works and how ActiveSync searches for the users mailbox</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange ActiveSync and the /Exchange virtual directory</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407085</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:11:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407085</guid><dc:creator>Christian Schindler</dc:creator><description>After all the SP2 posts here, all I can say is: &amp;quot;Deliver it - I need it&amp;quot; :-)</description></item><item><title>Exchange ActiveSync and the /Exchange virtual directory</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407091</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:59:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407091</guid><dc:creator>Welcome to Flaphead.com @ Home</dc:creator><description>Humm, so 324306 XADM: How Exchange 2000 Web Storage System and Exchange 2000 Installable File System...</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange ActiveSync and the /Exchange virtual directory</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407092</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:01:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407092</guid><dc:creator>Flaphead</dc:creator><description>So does this mean that SMTPProxy is no longer needed or used?</description></item><item><title>Weekend reading</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407170</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:16:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407170</guid><dc:creator>subject: exchange</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Weekend reading</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407174</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:17:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407174</guid><dc:creator>subject: exchange</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Weekend reading</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407178</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:18:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407178</guid><dc:creator>subject: exchange</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Weekend reading</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407182</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:19:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407182</guid><dc:creator>subject: exchange</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Exchange ActiveSync and the /Exchange virtual directory</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407220</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2005 15:32:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407220</guid><dc:creator>Dan Sheehan</dc:creator><description>We use a single URL for our 5.5 OWA and 2003 FE. /Exchange/ is owned by 5.5, and /2003/ is owned by 2003 FE. As you noted in SP1, this works great for our OWA users in any domain. But will the SP1 registry key you listed allow us to change the default VDIR for active sync allow us to use /2003/ for all our users? You noted it was an issue in SP1, but it seems like the lookup you all copied from SP1 OWA will allow us to succesfully use a non-default VDIR in SP2 for active sync.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great read BTW!</description></item><item><title>The Mobile Minute 101</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407392</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 03:25:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407392</guid><dc:creator>Nino.Mobile</dc:creator><description>&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;Software / Hardware&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PalmSource has shifted it&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;s engineering efforts to focus on...</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange ActiveSync and the /Exchange virtual directory</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#407568</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 02:23:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407568</guid><dc:creator>Dan Sheehan</dc:creator><description>Was wondering if you could address the VDIR reg hack working with the active synch question I had above.</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange ActiveSync and the /Exchange virtual directory</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#409216</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:46:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:409216</guid><dc:creator>Selva Nalliah</dc:creator><description>To answer Dan Sheehan's question above. Yes, you can still use the VDir registry key. If it is set to /2003 then all ActiveSync users will be redirected to that virtual directory.</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange ActiveSync and the /Exchange virtual directory</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#409279</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:53:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:409279</guid><dc:creator>m</dc:creator><description>Just wondering about the SMTPProxy registry key.. Can this have multiple values, i.e.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;domain.com; domain2.com; domain3.com&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;or will this choke ActiveSync? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange ActiveSync and the /Exchange virtual directory</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/29/407059.aspx#410550</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 01:33:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:410550</guid><dc:creator>Selva Nalliah</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Just wondering about the SMTPProxy registry key..Can this have multiple values?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No. We only allow a single proxy string.</description></item></channel></rss>