<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Outlook Web Access - A catalyst for web evolution</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx</link><description>"The Exchange Web Client" was the first web email client produced by Microsoft. It had an interesting green and black color scheme but it did most of the basic needs for doing messaging. We didn't have enough time to add calendaring support in the first</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Outlook Web Access - A catalyst for web evolution</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#406681</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:25:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406681</guid><dc:creator>Olivier Hault</dc:creator><description>I will like to see the next OWA release written for a new extensible and well documented &amp;quot;front end&amp;quot; framework build on top of ASP.NET (or even better XAML)&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Outlook Web Access - A catalyst for web evolution</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#406686</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:42:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406686</guid><dc:creator>Adam Gates</dc:creator><description>Thank you! OWA has been consistently the VERY BEST of E2K and E23k has to offer. Outlook is now completely available via the browser. Wonderful work!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now time for Word and Excel!!!</description></item><item><title>Alternate browsers</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#406694</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:26:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406694</guid><dc:creator>Rialtus</dc:creator><description>Curious question - the intent obviously was to ensure that OWA worked well with IE on Windows, and that's just fine being it's Microsoft. But there is a significant goodness when using &amp;quot;alternate&amp;quot; browsers (Netscape, Mozilla, etc.). Can you elaborate on the thought process that went on in addressing these broswers, as well as what difficulties you had in dealing with a feature rich browser like IE while providing basic functionality to the alternates?</description></item><item><title>History of Outlook Web Access</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#406707</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:31:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406707</guid><dc:creator>load of tosh</dc:creator><description>My dev lead Jim has a nice history of OWA on the Exchange blog.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; He talks a bit about the early...</description></item><item><title>Alternate browser support</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#406710</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:08:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406710</guid><dc:creator>Jim Van Eaton</dc:creator><description>We had to almost provide two codebases to support both experiences.  One for the rich IE5+ browsers and another for the alternative browsers.  This is one of the weaknesses of developing rich applications that many of the AJAX developers discuss.  We decided to take a more low risk approach and try and reach as many browsers as we could with the OWA Basic experience.  Going forward, this strategy may change since other browsers have evolved and market conditions change.  I think this topic deserves a separate blog so stay tuned.</description></item><item><title>re: @Alternate browsers</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#406712</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:35:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406712</guid><dc:creator>Klaus H. Probst</dc:creator><description>I'm sure Jim will elaborate on their efforts to cater to &amp;quot;alternative browsers&amp;quot; if you point out a shipping browser that could actually compete with IE5 in 1998/1999.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW Jim - great entry. I like reading these 'once upon a time' blog posts very much.</description></item><item><title>Weekend reading</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#406820</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:18:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406820</guid><dc:creator>subject: exchange</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Microsoft Announces AJAX Toolkit Codenamed &amp;quot;Atlas&amp;quot;</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#407001</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:41:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407001</guid><dc:creator>Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Microsoft invented Ajaxing...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#407029</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:22:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407029</guid><dc:creator>Guardian Unlimited: Onlineblog</dc:creator><description>I've been following Ajaxing for a year or so (since Gmail appeared) and am amused to discover that Microsoft invented it for Outlook Web Access in 1998. Microsoft is also taking it further with its Atlas project: The Atlas Client...</description></item><item><title>Microsoft and AJAX</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#407095</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:52:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407095</guid><dc:creator>Vespa</dc:creator><description>Microsoft and AJAX</description></item><item><title>re: Outlook Web Access - A catalyst for web evolution</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#407421</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 19:15:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407421</guid><dc:creator>Amir</dc:creator><description>I wanted to find out why only Basic Experience of OWA is available on all browsers on Mac? I know they are referred as down-level clients but never have seen a good detailed description of why Premium experience can't be provided. I would need a feature list (I know ActiveX controls don't work there, neither XML, but need mroe specific info like why they are necessary and which features in Prem. OWA depend on these underlying feature-set) which is not available in Mac browsers which hinders provision of Premium experience. If someone already know of some public resource, please point me to that. Thanks!</description></item><item><title>the best u are</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#410146</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:410146</guid><dc:creator>Gergana</dc:creator><description>Your blog is very interesint</description></item><item><title>Microsoft's Atlas Project</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#420575</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:07:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420575</guid><dc:creator>coofucoo zhang</dc:creator><description>关注ms的Ajax行为。</description></item></channel></rss>