<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What happened to Badmails in Exchange 2003 SP1?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2004/07/20/188856.aspx</link><description>What are badmails? Badmails are mail that the Exchange server cannot deliver or NDR (non-delivery report). A common source of badmails comes from the unsuccessful attempt to deliver an DSN (delivery status notifiction. NDR is a form of DSN). We keep badmails</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Oh WOW - I didn't know THAT about Exchange 2003 sp1!</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2004/07/20/188856.aspx#189343</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 03:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:189343</guid><dc:creator>E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS </dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>What happened to Badmails in Exchange 2003 SP1?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2004/07/20/188856.aspx#189747</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:189747</guid><dc:creator>Welcome to Flaphead.com @ Home</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: What happened to Badmails in Exchange 2003 SP1?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2004/07/20/188856.aspx#193525</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 23:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:193525</guid><dc:creator>subsoniq</dc:creator><description>now, can you come out with a hotfix to allow this on exchange 2000? :&amp;gt;</description></item><item><title>re: allowing this for Exchange 2000</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2004/07/20/188856.aspx#193544</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 23:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:193544</guid><dc:creator>Philip Chan</dc:creator><description>The described behaviour is only available in Exchange 2003 Sp1. For other versions, the recommendation is to use the badmail script, which will allow similar behaviour. You can find the descritpon to the badmail script in Alvin Mok's blog linked above.</description></item><item><title>re: What happened to Badmails in Exchange 2003 SP1?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2004/07/20/188856.aspx#206048</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:206048</guid><dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator><description>Are the two registry keys DWORD type?</description></item><item><title>re: What happened to Badmails in Exchange 2003 SP1?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2004/07/20/188856.aspx#206076</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:206076</guid><dc:creator>Nino Bilic</dc:creator><description>Brian - yes, they are both DWORDs.</description></item><item><title>re: What happened to Badmails in Exchange 2003 SP1?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2004/07/20/188856.aspx#208242</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:208242</guid><dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator><description>I've never understood why you don't just deliver the badmail to the postmaster as most other mail products do.  That would make it a lot easier for those of us who do want to review them.</description></item><item><title>re: Controlling BadMail with a Batch File</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2004/07/20/188856.aspx#316881</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:316881</guid><dc:creator>Michael's meanderings...</dc:creator><description /></item></channel></rss>