Look what I found in my loft: a 9-year old netbook

Ewan — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:56:00 GMT

I splashed out a week or two ago, and bought a Samsung NC10 netbook – a bargain at under £300, and it runs Windows 7 really well.

Impressed with the size and utility of the thing, I recalled a forerunner of the netbook, so went rooting around in my “box of old technology that it pretty much useless but cost money so I can’t ever throw it away”, in the loft.

I came across an old laptop that in its time was known as a “sub-notebook”: we got two of these machines courtesy of Sony, to demonstrate Exchange 2000, specifically the Conferencing Server version, at a big partner event in Birmingham. It was, to date, the biggest audience I’ve ever stood in front of, at about 1,400 people. I had a few minutes to demo the still-in-beta Exchange 2000, and would be doing it jointly with the host for the conference, Jonathan Ross (gulp).

Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server – aka “Jasper”

I’m now struggling to remember when this was, but since Exchange 2000 released in November 2000 (as discovered by the very useful Microsoft Support Lifecycle page), I reckon it must have been early/mid-2000, which would mean the little Vaio has to be at least 8 or 9 years old.

Sony Vaio PCG-C1XN

The two Vaios we had were great – well, great for the time anyway, although even then they were very functionally compromised even when new. The one thing you could say about the machine was it was small, and cool.

Certainly not fast – a 266MHz Celeron CPU (a cut down Pentium II, in essence, for our younger readers), 64Mb of RAM and a 6.4Gb hard disk.

The machines originally came with Windows 98, but we decided to put Windows 2000 on them for the demo; subsequently, I upgraded it to Windows XP and it’s probably a bit too much for the little mite. Suffice to say, it won’t be getting any further along the Windows evolutionary scale.

Other features of note were the webcam (one of – if not the – first laptops to come with one built in, which was the reason we wanted them for the Conferencing demo). A single USB port, FireWire (or iLink as Sony insisted on calling it), a PCMCIA slot, infra-red (you don’t get that any more now, do you?) and a dongle which had composite-video and VGA, complete the mix.

So for our demo we had to install an early Wifi network (it might have been the very first 802.11b from Compaq, costing hundreds of pounds for the router and at least £100 per PCMCIA card). All of this for 8 minutes of Woss-y glory, swept away in the sands of time.

Sony never did ask for it back – I hung onto one, and Steve kept the other. I bet he’s still got it somewhere too.

Dust the old girl off

Enough of this misty eyed nonsense. Amazingly, on plugging the machine in and powering up (apart from my going into the BIOS and setting the clock), it started to resume from hibernate – and dropped me back into the logon prompt for WinXP. I had some head scratching to do, to remember the password – but when I logged in, it was the first time for 6 years and 3 months.

Surprisingly, the Vaio is about the same thickness as my Samsung, so it doesn’t look quite as archaic as you might expect a 9-year old laptop to.

It could even be called a “Netbook”, except there’s no networking on the thing – certainly no wireless, and even dial-up would have required an old modem like the Xircom PCMCIA card I literally just found in my office drawer.

Probably the biggest difference is the price when new. Adjusting for inflation and taking into account what the Vaio would have originally cost, it’s probably nearer £3,000 than the £300 for my NC10.

That’s Moore’s law for ya.

Windows Home Server - would you have it in your home?

Ewan — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:24:00 GMT

I just read an interesting article from Adrian Kingsley-Hughes on ZDNet about Windows Home Server, speculating whether there really was a market for such a device, and who would buy it.

Adrian's point - and it is a valid one, if you know anything about what the "typical" home user might do and buy - is that your average Joe or Joanna isn't going to march out and splash a few hundred quid on a box to back up all their home PCs, even if they've lost precious data before.

In an enterprise IT environment, disaster recovery has often been treated as a second-class citizen, until a disaster actually happens - after which point, it's properly factored into things. I vividly recall making the case for DLT drives over DAT over 10 years ago, yet on cost grounds alone it looked like DAT could do the biz... until the crunch came, a disaster happened, it looked like the DR plan wasn't quite up to scratch, and after that it was easy to get money to do DR properly.

Sad to say it, but 9/11 and the London 7/7 bombings in 2005 probably helped a lot of organisations realise that backup (and more importantly, recovery) was actually worth spending a bit of time & effort on. You only realise how important it is to have a contingency plan, when you're faced with the real need to have - or to show you have - one.

As an aside, if you haven't seen it yet, Microsoft announced Data Protection Manager 2007 recently, as a means to snapshot and backup various systems to low-cost disk backup. DPM could allow you to backup not just file systems, but Exchange, Sharepoint and SQL Server, using VSS snapshot technology. We're now using it internally to back Exchange up to low-cost SAS drives, as well as other things.

I have a buddy who's known as "Foggy" (from "Foghorn Leghorn"), so called because he had a loud voice on the phone when he first joined Microsoft in a Product Support Services role. If you're interested in DPM2007, just let me know and I'll put you in touch with him - he's "Mr DPM" in the UK and is keen to tell everyone just how good it is.

ANYWAY.

Back to Home Server. I've been beta-testing the "Q"/"Quattro" product for a while, and I think the finished Home Server looks really good. Have I got one at home? Yes. But then, I only have one other PC at home (besides the corporate laptops that occupy the place, and a few old machines that spend most of their time powered off) so I'm not sure I'd shell out for a Home Server (when they're comercially available) just to protect that one box, and serve it content.

What I'd wish for Home Server

I'd love it if Windows Home Server could be a Media Center - ie I could whack a couple of TV Tuners in the WHS box, and it would stream that content to other PCs or Media Center Extenders around the house. Think of it like a Windows Media Center Server, if you like. I might even think about sticking the box in the loft, next to the Coax-amplifier which distributes TV signals around the house - especially if Bluetooth or WiFi remotes from around the house could control the Server, making the MCE experience available on remote PCs, Extenders and directly on TVs themselves.

I'd also really like some OEM to bring out a device which was hardened and much more appliance-like, maybe with some other features - I'm thinking like a box which had a Powerline-ethernet style built-in power supply (and corresponding remote adapter(s)) which would mean I could stick the box anywhere there was power and not worry about signal or CAT-5 cabling back to the wired/wireless network that all the PCs are on. I was thinking it would be quite cool to have a Windows Home Server in the garage. My garage is separate from the house (by about 6 ft) so if the house burned down, there is a chance the garage wouldn't (though there's probably enough combustible material in the garage to make it happen the other way around).

I thought if I could put a WHS in the garage, it would mean I wouldn't need to cool the box much (even in the summer, the garage is going to be cooler than many places, and in the winter, it's positively COLD) and apart from the odd spider invading the box, it'd probably be pretty hazard-free.

So in an ideal world, a Home Server would be a solid-state box with no vents or fans, which can draw network access through its power supply. There might be one company - Tranquil PC - who'll be able to offer this nirvana sooner than most. Tranquil PC have some very interesting fanless technology, but for a regular PC there's a payoff in terms of performance (ie to run their box cool enough so it doesn't need a fan, it's not exactly cutting edge) and price (there's a premium for the design and low-volume nature). For a home server, you're not bothered about quad core processors with 8Gb of RAM, so Tranquil's offerings could well be in the sweet spot. Time will tell if the price point people are willing to pay will match these expectations.

Coming back to the ZDNet article - Adrian reckons that the average home user will spend $30 on backup. I know I've had hard disk failures but probably only back up to the USB disk I already have, every couple of months. Who's going to buy Home Server this year, in time for Christmas? Tech-savvy folk who have multiple PCs at home, I'd think - maybe families where each of the kids have their own PC, but not exactly the less tech-literate types.

Maybe the time for Home Server is when it can not only stream data to remote devices, back them up and make sure they're appropriately patched - but when users in the home can have the Home Server record stuff from the TV and distribute it directly to their device for later viewing.

Maybe that's v2 functionality, who knows?

The Electric Wand : Exchange, Consumer Tech

Look what I found in my loft: a 9-year old netbook

Windows Home Server - would you have it in your home?