<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx</link><description>I’ve posted several IMF-related blog postings in the past — here , here , and here . In these posts, I’ve focused mainly on the gateway behavior of the IMF. This is because that’s really what the IMF is, of course… just the gateway behavior. But when</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#364051</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:364051</guid><dc:creator>XavBlog.net</dc:creator><description>Evan posted on his blog an excellent article concerning IMF and the Junk Email f</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#364066</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 01:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:364066</guid><dc:creator>Colin Walker</dc:creator><description>Evan has taken a further look at IMF and it's relationship with the Outlook Junk E-mail folder.</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#368175</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 04:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:368175</guid><dc:creator>Lee Chiang Yen</dc:creator><description>Hi Evans, thanks for your excellent blog on this topic. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have found some interesting behaviour on the store threshold. If the Extended rule is set using Outlook 2003 in cached mode, email with SCL equal or higher than the threshold gets filtered. But if I were to turned on the rule via OWA 2003, only email with a value higher than the threshold gets filtered. I have done the test a few times and I get the same result all the time. Is it possible that you can verify this with someone on the Exchange team?</description></item><item><title>Exchange, Windows, XP, SPS, SMS, MOM, Misc.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#368466</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:368466</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Clustering </dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#368468</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:368468</guid><dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator><description>Lee -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What you describe wouldn't surprise me at all! The original documentation all discusses treating the Extended rule for StoreActionThreshold as a &amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot; value, and it's only because Outlook treats it as &amp;quot;&amp;gt;=&amp;quot; rather than as &amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot; that we have this confusion. It seems quite reasonable to me that Outlook Web Access would treat it as originally documented, although I can see how this could lead to unpredictable behavior. Do you have a case opened with PSS on this issue? If it's causing you trouble in your environment, you may want to pursue that route and see if there's anything that can be done to stabilize this behavior for future versions...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evan</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#368517</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:368517</guid><dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Hi Evan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think these lines are missing in the ForceJunkEmail sub.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;xmlhttp = &amp;quot;&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;xmlhttp = xmlhttp &amp;amp; &amp;quot;Cmd=options&amp;quot; &amp;amp; vbLf&lt;br&gt;xmlhttp = xmlhttp &amp;amp; &amp;quot;junkemailstate=1&amp;quot; &amp;amp; vbLf&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Xavier&lt;br&gt;&lt;a target="_new" href="http://xavblog.net"&gt;http://xavblog.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#369134</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 19:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:369134</guid><dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator><description>Thanks to Xavier for providing some changes to the script and allowing me to post the update. The script now listed in the blog post should now hopefully work for everyone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evan</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#371169</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:371169</guid><dc:creator>LichlordX</dc:creator><description>This works just great.  We are going to test using this for a bunch of users.  However, is there a way to mass turn junk email off if we don't like it?  I tried setting &amp;quot;junkemailstate=0&amp;quot; but that didn't work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#372473</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:372473</guid><dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator><description>Not aware of any way to bulk disable the extended rule, although if anyone knows of a way feel free to post it or let me know. You could, of course, turn off the IMF at the gateway to stop the SCL from appearing on the message. This would serve as a sort of &amp;quot;bulk disable&amp;quot; for the extended rule.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why do you want to disable the rule in bulk? Remember that the more common case is that SOME users have it enabled already (cached mode Outlook 2003) and you realize that other users need to have it added to have consistency.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evan</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#372694</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 03:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:372694</guid><dc:creator>Milton Lopez</dc:creator><description>The script worked when I ran it using the Administrator accont and on its corresponding maibox, but it fails with &amp;quot;Http status code=403&amp;quot; if I use on any other mailbox, even with the user's credentials. Help!!!  ;)</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#372758</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:372758</guid><dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator><description>Milton -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't run into the 403 errors from the script before, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if it was related to permissions not being in place to log into each user's mailbox. In order to set the options for each mailbox, you will need to have rights to login to the mailbox with the account you specify. Have a look at &lt;a target="_new" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/273642"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/273642&lt;/a&gt; for more information on how to set this up most effectively (it's the same permissions you would need to run Exmerge using this account).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evan</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#373765</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 02:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:373765</guid><dc:creator>Milton Lopez</dc:creator><description>Thanks Evan! I tried it. There were a couple of Deny entries at the Organization level for the Administrator account which I removed. Still no go. I should have mentioned is that the Exchange site was set to require https and allow only basic authentication. I tried allowing http access and Windows authentication, but still no go, even after re-setting IIS on the server. Do the Exchange services need to be re-started for any of these changes to take effect? Also, what is the proper syntax for the server name, account name and mailbox name? I've tried the usual but I wonder if the methids being called require something different.</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#373856</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:373856</guid><dc:creator>Milton Lopez</dc:creator><description>Hang on - I got it working after disabling basic authentication (I left it on after enabling Windows authentication). According to the script all mailboxes now have the extended rule. But ... no filtering seems to be taking place. I'll try restarting the Exchange services a bit later tonight. How I wish that wasn't necessary to make changes to the IMF settings (it makes the &amp;quot;I&amp;quot; in IMF stand for &amp;quot;Incomplete&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Inconvenient&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Irritating&amp;quot;).&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#373879</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:373879</guid><dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator><description>Milton -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You should only need to restart the store on the mailbox server after the IMF is first installed (ie - the store has to be cycled to recognize that the first IMF has been installed into the organization). Subsequent changes to the IMF levels/settings don't require a restart, as there is a notification set up with the AD.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Probably the best way to troubleshoot this is to set up the &amp;quot;view the SCLs within Outlook&amp;quot; form (&lt;a target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/exchange/archive/2004/05/26/142607.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/exchange/archive/2004/05/26/142607.aspx&lt;/a&gt;) and make sure the items arriving to the mailbox have the appropriate SCL in place such that they SHOULD be getting moved to Junk Email.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evan</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#374748</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:374748</guid><dc:creator>Milton Lopez</dc:creator><description>Evan: thanks for the very helpful explanation that IMF setting changes do not require a re-start. The phrasing in the Admin Guide was a bit confusing.&lt;br&gt;Now I'm seeing one out of several dozen messages stored in my Junk Email folder. I installed the form and added the SCL column to my Inbox. I see one message with an SCL of -1 (which happens to be from me to an &amp;quot;all users&amp;quot; list). The rest, including a few that arrived since the change, do not show anything at all in the SCL column. I get the feeling that all this I may be due to something very simple, but what could it be?</description></item><item><title>re: IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#374756</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:374756</guid><dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator><description>Milton -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the SCL is -1, that means it came from a &amp;quot;trusted&amp;quot; (ie - authenticated) source inside your organization. If the SCL is blank, it means the IMF has not processed the message to stamp an SCL on it. There are a number of reasons this might happen. The most obvious thing to check is that your IMF is configured properly on the inbound gateway server's SMTP virtual server, and that it's bound properly to the VS, etc. Less obvious possibilities might range to the &amp;quot;15-character servername&amp;quot; hotfix for IMF. Your best bet if you can't find a ready solution might be to hit the microsoft.public newsgroups, as lots of these sort of IMF issues have been resolved there very successfully.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evan</description></item><item><title>Exchange, Windows, XP, SPS, SMS, MOM, Misc.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#394164</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:394164</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Clustering </dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#406019</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:57:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406019</guid><dc:creator>Welcome to Flaphead.com @ Home</dc:creator><description>I just came across this Blog by Evan and it's does make interesting reading.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; And the script is...</description></item><item><title>Approaches to fighting spam in an Exchange environment</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#406403</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:43:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406403</guid><dc:creator>Eileen Brown's WebLog</dc:creator><description>Greg presented this Technet evening for me last night.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; The topic was all about fighting spam -...</description></item><item><title>How to find out which users have the Junk E-mail rule enabled</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#423839</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 01:14:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:423839</guid><dc:creator>Evan Dodds - Microsoft Exchange Server Blog</dc:creator><description>I received an email the other day from someone who had read my &amp;amp;amp;ldquo;IMF and the Junk E-Mail folder...</description></item><item><title>IMF2 gefilterte Mails werden nicht in Junk-Mail des jeweiligen Postfachs verschoben | hilpers</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#3185066</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:47:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3185066</guid><dc:creator>IMF2 gefilterte Mails werden nicht in Junk-Mail des jeweiligen Postfachs verschoben | hilpers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.hilpers.com/1175779-imf2-gefilterte-mails-werden-nicht"&gt;http://www.hilpers.com/1175779-imf2-gefilterte-mails-werden-nicht&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Junk E-Mai Filter bei ausgeschalteten Cache-Modus | hilpers</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#3187019</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:43:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3187019</guid><dc:creator>Junk E-Mai Filter bei ausgeschalteten Cache-Modus | hilpers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.hilpers.com/858353-junk-e-mai-filter-bei"&gt;http://www.hilpers.com/858353-junk-e-mai-filter-bei&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Change Junk E-mail SCL | keyongtech</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/evand/archive/2005/01/31/363935.aspx#3189603</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:16:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3189603</guid><dc:creator>Change Junk E-mail SCL | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/1676249-change-junk-e-mail-scl"&gt;http://www.keyongtech.com/1676249-change-junk-e-mail-scl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>