<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>An upgrade that saves space</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/efleis/archive/2004/10/01/236866.aspx</link><description>It’s always great to show all of the new, innovative things a product can do. But sometimes it’s great to show how you are doing what you did before, but now you can do it better, faster and more efficiently than you did in the previous version. There’s</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: An upgrade that saves space</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/efleis/archive/2004/10/01/236866.aspx#236955</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2004 10:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:236955</guid><dc:creator>Guido</dc:creator><description>other ways to save space in the DIT is to remove unneccessary information from it or at least move it into an application partition so that the objects don't replicate to GCs. The latter is related to moving DNS records to the respective App partitions (should not really be approached until all DNS servers have been upgraded to 2003). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But other unneccessary stuff involves the Distributed Link Tracking records: they also waste a lot of space in the DIT as they're not reall used by any app. My recommendation: disable the Distributed Link Tracking Services on DCs and then remove the respective records from all domain NCs (within the System container). Naturally you can't really regain the space until an offline defrag after the tombstone lifetime (if you needed more space quickly, I'd first set minimal ACLs on the objects prior to deleting them). Good news: the Distributed Link Tracking services are turned off by default in Win 2003 ;-)&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: An upgrade that saves space</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/efleis/archive/2004/10/01/236866.aspx#236991</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2004 16:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:236991</guid><dc:creator>joe</dc:creator><description>Great post ~Eric. Keep them coming. Heres a topic idea... Discussion around maximum record sizes and administrative limits on objects. And aother... Can indexing hurt you?  And... Is there any benefit to indexing objectclass and why does it help?  That should keep you going for a bit. :o) </description></item><item><title>re: An upgrade that saves space</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/efleis/archive/2004/10/01/236866.aspx#237082</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2004 01:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:237082</guid><dc:creator>Ulf B. Simon-Weidner</dc:creator><description>Hi Eric, great info - I wasn't aware of this but greatly apprechiate it. Curious to see more.</description></item><item><title>Horse, go get in front of that cart would ya?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/efleis/archive/2004/10/01/236866.aspx#237401</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 08:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:237401</guid><dc:creator>Eric Fleischman's WebLog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Horse, go get in front of that cart would ya?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/efleis/archive/2004/10/01/236866.aspx#237402</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 08:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:237402</guid><dc:creator>Eric Fleischman's WebLog</dc:creator><description /></item></channel></rss>