<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Enterprise Engineering Center Blog : Exchange</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/eec/archive/tags/Exchange/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Exchange</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Benchmarking Exchange 2010 on Fusion IO solid state drives</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/eec/archive/2009/10/13/3286570.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3286570</guid><dc:creator>EEC</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/eec/comments/3286570.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/eec/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3286570</wfw:commentRss><description>During a recent engagement with Siemens SWAT team we were able to benchmark Fusion IO cards in their exchange environment and used JetStress 2010. The server used was an HP 385 G5 running Windows 2008 R2. Below are the storage performance results from...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/eec/archive/2009/10/13/3286570.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3286570" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/eec/archive/tags/Partners/default.aspx">Partners</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/eec/archive/tags/Exchange/default.aspx">Exchange</category></item><item><title>Virtualized Exchange Saves Power</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/eec/archive/2009/06/16/3255513.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3255513</guid><dc:creator>EEC</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/eec/comments/3255513.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/eec/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3255513</wfw:commentRss><description>Earlier this year, Rob Simpson, Exchange Program Manager completed some testing while at the EEC to document the power savings that are possible when you virtualize your Exchange environment. What he found was that you can have a 50% power savings with...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/eec/archive/2009/06/16/3255513.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3255513" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/eec/archive/tags/Documentation/default.aspx">Documentation</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/eec/archive/tags/Exchange/default.aspx">Exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/eec/archive/tags/Virtualization/default.aspx">Virtualization</category></item></channel></rss>