<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Dwayne's Blog : 64-bit</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/dwayne_fernandez/archive/tags/64-bit/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: 64-bit</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>64-bit and Adobe</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/dwayne_fernandez/archive/2008/04/03/64-bit-and-adobe.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3027901</guid><dc:creator>dwaynef</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/dwayne_fernandez/comments/3027901.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/dwayne_fernandez/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3027901</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Interesting blog from John Nack, seems CS4 will only be 64-bit for Windows, with Mac users having to wait for CS5. Full article &lt;A class="" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/04/photoshop_lr_64.html" mce_href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/04/photoshop_lr_64.html"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;, exerpt below&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H3 class=title&gt;Photoshop, Lightroom, and Adobe's 64-bit roadmap&lt;/H3&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As you've probably seen, among the great features in the &lt;A href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/04/lightroom_2_the.html"&gt;Lightroom 2.0 beta&lt;/A&gt; is its ability to run 64-bit-native on Mac (Intel, 10.5.x) and Windows (Vista 64).&amp;nbsp; If you think it feels great to beat Aperture to the punch here, you're right. :-)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What does &lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit"&gt;64-bit computing&lt;/A&gt; mean, practically speaking? In a nutshell, it lets an application address very large amounts of memory--specifically, more than 4 gigabytes. This is great for pro photographers with large collections of high-res images: Lightroom being able to address more RAM means less time swapping images into and out of memory during image processing-intensive operations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's also important to say what 64-bit &lt;EM&gt;doesn't&lt;/EM&gt; mean. It doesn't make applications somehow run twice as fast. As Photoshop architect Scott Byer &lt;A href="http://blogs.adobe.com/scottbyer/2006/12/64_bitswhen.html"&gt;writes&lt;/A&gt;, "&lt;U&gt;64-bit applications don't magically get faster access to memory&lt;/U&gt;, or any of the other key things that would help most applications perform better." In our testing, when an app isn't using a large data set (one that would otherwise require memory swapping), the speedup due to running in 64-bit mode is around 8-12%.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Therefore 64-bit is a good thing for Lightroom now, and as the amount of data photographers handle inexorably grows, it'll become a bigger win.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Lightroom news naturally raises the question: What's Adobe doing with Photoshop? In the interest of giving customers guidance as early as possible, we have some news to share on this point: in addition to offering 32-bit-native versions for Mac OS X and 32-bit Windows, just as we do today, we plan to ship the next version of Photoshop as 64-bit-native for Windows 64-bit OSes only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3027901" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/dwayne_fernandez/archive/tags/64-bit/default.aspx">64-bit</category></item></channel></rss>