<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SoftGrid Sequencer: How many processors for best performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/dhitchen/archive/2007/09/05/softgrid-sequencer-how-many-processors-for-best-performance.aspx</link><description>The simple answer is one (1). The sequencer is a single threaded application and will not take advantage of multi-core or multi-socket systems. Sequencer investments are better made in the disk I/O sub-system (see my item on disk performance). In theory,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator></channel></rss>