<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Virtualisation (2 of 3) - Why should you care?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/daven/archive/2007/03/01/virtualisation-2-of-3-why-should-you-care.aspx</link><description>Everything we implement has to have a great Return on Investment (ROI) and the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) must always be low. We all want to increase the availability of our systems, and we all want to 'do more with less'. Here's a good one: We all</description><dc:language>en-IE</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Dave Northey on Virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/daven/archive/2007/03/01/virtualisation-2-of-3-why-should-you-care.aspx#669894</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 01:28:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:669894</guid><dc:creator>Dugie's Pensieve</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave Northey has written a great 3 part article on Virtualization: Virtualisation (1 of 3) - What is&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Virtualisation (2 of 3) - Why should you care?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/daven/archive/2007/03/01/virtualisation-2-of-3-why-should-you-care.aspx#2139472</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:47:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2139472</guid><dc:creator>Arun.PC</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dave,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don't quite get it when you say &amp;quot;You can actually mix application and session virtualisation together and come up with a very neat solution - run your applications in a sandbox on the terminal servers!&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hybrid solution which you talked about(above statement) is not a standard one and cannot be used in an enterprise with large users running a lot of mission business applications(egs:-global bank).To me it appears like a makeshift arrangement of already existing Terminal Services and other Application virtualization software.Hence i think it is not at all scalable. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, I dont quite know about the possibilities of the same. Would like to hear about it from you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arun.PC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arunpc.wordpress.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>