<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>High Performance Upgrades for MOSS 2007 &amp;amp; WSS 3.0 (Database Migration Methods)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/corybu/archive/2007/08/02/high-performance-upgrades-for-moss-2007-wss-3-0-database-migration-methods.aspx</link><description>If you’re looking for the best performance and quickest upgrade I highly recommend the Database Migration approach. At MSIT our preferred method is such, it allows a creative flexible upgrade path that has the fastest throughput. Using a method we call</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Kaizenlog ?? Database 03/08/2007</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/corybu/archive/2007/08/02/high-performance-upgrades-for-moss-2007-wss-3-0-database-migration-methods.aspx#2064404</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 06:44:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2064404</guid><dc:creator>Kaizenlog ?? Database 03/08/2007</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.kaizenlog.com/2007/08/03/database-03082007/"&gt;http://www.kaizenlog.com/2007/08/03/database-03082007/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: High Performance Upgrades for MOSS 2007 &amp; WSS 3.0 (Database Migration Methods)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/corybu/archive/2007/08/02/high-performance-upgrades-for-moss-2007-wss-3-0-database-migration-methods.aspx#3010155</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:36:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3010155</guid><dc:creator>PG1</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We've tried this suggestion and have noticed that we are hitting a bottleneck particularly with the database I/O. &amp;nbsp;We have a SQL Server Cluster on a SAN but have found that running multiple front-ends actually slows the process down significantly. &amp;nbsp;When you mention &amp;quot;high powered&amp;quot;, can you provide some details? &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>The Zero Downtime SharePoint Patching Myth</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/corybu/archive/2007/08/02/high-performance-upgrades-for-moss-2007-wss-3-0-database-migration-methods.aspx#3097434</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:42:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3097434</guid><dc:creator>Todd Carter's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately it is not possible to update/patch SharePoint without occurring some amount downtime. So&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>I was with a customer one day…</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/corybu/archive/2007/08/02/high-performance-upgrades-for-moss-2007-wss-3-0-database-migration-methods.aspx#3179503</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:46:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3179503</guid><dc:creator>It's my life... And I live it...</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;And several topics came up so I thought I would post some of them here. Here are some of the counters&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>