<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Bridging the gap....</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/chrisavis/archive/2007/04/13/bridging-the-gap.aspx</link><description>subtitle - an overuse of parentheticals.... An email came across an internal alias today that really got me thinking....I am going to quote a portion of it here..... The weirdest thing happened tonight – my Outlook said it was connected. To Exchange Server.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Bridging the gap....</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/chrisavis/archive/2007/04/13/bridging-the-gap.aspx#763886</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:35:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:763886</guid><dc:creator>chrisavis</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;UPDATE - I forgot to mention....I even have this implemented on my server Exchange server at home. Under Exchange 2003 it isn't a cakewalk to implement, but Exchange 2007 is pretty darn simple.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>