<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Looking for Motherboard suggestions....</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/chrisavis/archive/2008/09/15/looking-for-motherboard-suggestions.aspx</link><description>I have several dual-CPU machines. Yes....these are true multiple-CPU machines, not multi-core machines. With one exception, I have been very happy with these machines over the years. I would like to build a super server based on a dual-CPU config with</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Looking for Motherboard suggestions....</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/chrisavis/archive/2008/09/15/looking-for-motherboard-suggestions.aspx#3124483</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:44:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3124483</guid><dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I like AMD solutions better for multiple CPU's. The AMD HT (Hyper Transport) technology works very well. Any high end motherboard you get now is going to support at least 16GB if not 32GB. I am assuming you will be using Server08 and Hyper-V. Should be a kickin server when all said and done. I like ASUS a lot. My rule is when you go high end with Intel platform, stay with an Intel motherboard. Intel support is great. Keep us posted on the server! AMD platform = ASUS &amp;nbsp; Intel platform = Intel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just my .02&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>