Inappropriate relations with a Sun server...http://blogs.technet.com/brycemilton/archive/2005/03/11/394339.aspxWow! If a Microsoftie has a few complimentary words to say about Sun's latest Windows-compatible hardware, should he be fired for revealing his latent "hardware fetishist" tendencies? According to TheRegister , the answer is a logic-defying "yes". Fortunately,en-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)re: Inappropriate relations with a Sun server...http://blogs.technet.com/brycemilton/archive/2005/03/11/394339.aspx#394406Sat, 12 Mar 2005 07:51:00 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:394406RaoulBut then, have you been fired or not?re: Inappropriate relations with a Sun server...http://blogs.technet.com/brycemilton/archive/2005/03/11/394339.aspx#394431Sat, 12 Mar 2005 09:10:00 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:394431Bryce Miltonnopere: Inappropriate relations with a Sun server...http://blogs.technet.com/brycemilton/archive/2005/03/11/394339.aspx#394720Sun, 13 Mar 2005 02:40:00 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:394720Please enter your nameYo, beastie is not going to be Unemployed... Maybe you should *actually* READ the announcement. <br> <br>One thing I like about 64 bit sun/M$ software. <br> <br>Viruses that run even that MUCH FASTER!re: Inappropriate relations with a Sun server...http://blogs.technet.com/brycemilton/archive/2005/03/11/394339.aspx#395960Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:17:00 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:395960RichardThat was pretty typical Reg writing style. They're a bit more &lt;ahem&gt; flamboyant than most other IT news mags. <br> <br>I think that's where their readers come from - they have more or less the same content as ZDnet or whoever, just rather more entertainingly written.