<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>64-bit and Virtualization - Mainstream?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/bjarned/archive/2007/04/05/64-bit-and-virtualization-mainstream.aspx</link><description>Virtualization will drive the adoption of 64-bit computing. Back when we first started with the program we refer to as the Common Engineering Criteria (CEC), we pushed support for Virtualization and 64-bit processors across our products. Now it looks</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Speedlinking #707 - WDS, 4Gb RAM, Powershell and Common Engineering Criteria 2008</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/bjarned/archive/2007/04/05/64-bit-and-virtualization-mainstream.aspx#729843</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 04:00:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:729843</guid><dc:creator>Dugie's Pensieve</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a list of assorted links I thought were interesting. I've been distracted and haven't blogged&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: 64-bit and Virtualization - Mainstream?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/bjarned/archive/2007/04/05/64-bit-and-virtualization-mainstream.aspx#730074</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 05:28:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:730074</guid><dc:creator>ttoennies</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is great news. Finally Virtual Server will be on-par with VMWare Server by allowing x64 guests on an x64 host. &amp;nbsp;Late but it is still great news.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>