<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Is 2005 the year for 64-bit computing?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/barnaby_jeans/archive/2005/01/20/357780.aspx</link><description>In a previous post we talked about whether 2005 was the year for Linux, in this post we'll discuss whether this is the year that 64-bit computing really takes off both in the enterprise and on the desktop. I have spent the last week sitting in sessions</description><dc:language>en-CA</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Is 2005 the year for 64-bit computing?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/barnaby_jeans/archive/2005/01/20/357780.aspx#379943</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:379943</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><description>Is 2005 the year for 64-bit computing?</description></item></channel></rss>