<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Broadening the base</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b2ix/archive/2007/05/01/broadening-the-base.aspx</link><description>Sean O'Driscoll has a great post critiquing a recent Reuters article about allegedly low participation rates in Web 2.0 communities. Sean outlines what he refers to as the thick contributors (video contributors, for example) vs the thin contributors (taggers,</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>strange currencies (or, community measurements re-imagined)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b2ix/archive/2007/05/01/broadening-the-base.aspx#879024</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 01:27:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:879024</guid><dc:creator>Pieces of me on community...</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;You know with love come strange currencies&amp;quot; R.E.M -- Strange Currencies (since thinking about this post,&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>