<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Oracle Spreads Fractional Holiday Cheer</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2005/12/20/oracle-spreads-fractional-holiday-cheer.aspx</link><description>Under the new pricing scheme, an eight dual-core server (total 16 cores) containing IBM's Power chip would result in a charge for six Oracle processor licenses (.75 time eight). An eight dual-core server produced by AMD or Intel would result in a charge</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>A Multi Grab Bag</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2005/12/20/oracle-spreads-fractional-holiday-cheer.aspx#669376</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:00:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:669376</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Division WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;CNET reported that Oracle &amp;quot;quietly cut software prices on some lower-end servers using multicore processors.&amp;quot; Un-related to this, if you're interested in the network access control capabilities in Longhorn, check out Adam's post about NAP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=669376" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Virtualization and Windows vs Linux review of current licensing policies</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2005/12/20/oracle-spreads-fractional-holiday-cheer.aspx#462788</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:03:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:462788</guid><dc:creator>Dugie's Pensieve</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Virtualization and Windows licensing has been a pain point for a long time. There has been hints...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=462788" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Linux-Watch: get the facts</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2005/12/20/oracle-spreads-fractional-holiday-cheer.aspx#462565</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:00:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:462565</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Division WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Every now and again I use this blog to correct inaccuracies in the public domain. Mostly errors at media outlets. And usually I wouldn't comment on opinion pieces at Linux-Watch because the rhetorical debate would be fruitless. But one of our pals at&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=462565" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Oracle Spreads Fractional Holiday Cheer</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2005/12/20/oracle-spreads-fractional-holiday-cheer.aspx#416321</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 02:10:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:416321</guid><dc:creator>David Hunter</dc:creator><description>When I saw the first headlines ( e.g. &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1903865,00.asp&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Oracle"&gt;http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1903865,00.asp&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Oracle&lt;/a&gt; Changes Prices to Reflect Multicore Chips&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;), I was thinking of a post on Oracle caving in and following Microsoft's lead on multicore pricing. Then I read the details and had to laugh.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=416321" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>