http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/10/412280.aspxToday we announced some significant licensing changes with regards to virtualization and Windows Server 2003: (1) Starting with Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition - customers can run up to 4 virtual instances of Windows Server 2003 (any editionen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/10/412280.aspx#666794Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:58:04 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:666794tonyso<p>Mike Neil's blog post on the Microsoft Virtualization Strategy is an important read if you are in this</p> <img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=666794" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/10/412280.aspx#462789Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:03:17 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:462789Dugie's Pensieve<p>Virtualization and Windows licensing has been a pain point for a long time. There has been hints...</p> <img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=462789" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/10/412280.aspx#462566Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:00:13 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:462566Windows Server Division WebLog<p>Every now and again I use this blog to correct inaccuracies in the public domain. Mostly errors at media outlets. And usually I wouldn't comment on opinion pieces at Linux-Watch because the rhetorical debate would be fruitless. But one of our pals at</p> <img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=462566" width="1" height="1">