http://blogs.technet.com/b/wincat/archive/2006/05/23/429988.aspxMore and more customers seem to be using "lower risk" as justification for their multiple forest plan. It may seem reasonable at first glance, but something about it doesn't feel right to me. Since recognizing this pattern a couple of months ago, I'veen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.technet.com/b/wincat/archive/2006/05/23/429988.aspx#432485Sun, 04 Jun 2006 08:02:32 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:432485Windows Server Division Customer Advisory TeamI've received a few interesting email messages about my last post on multiple forests (<a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/wincat/archive/2006/05/23/429988.aspx">http://blogs.technet.com/wincat/archive/2006/05/23/429988.aspx</a>)....<img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=432485" width="1" height="1">