<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Google Apps: Productive Anywhere?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/whymicrosoft/archive/2012/09/12/google-apps-productive-anywhere.aspx</link><description>Five years is a long time. In five years, the British developed the 2012 Olympic Stadium. In five years, San Francisco built the Golden Gate Bridge. In five years, Apple released six generations of its iPhone. 
 Five years is how long Google has been</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Google Apps: Productive Anywhere?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/whymicrosoft/archive/2012/09/12/google-apps-productive-anywhere.aspx#3535957</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:00:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3535957</guid><dc:creator>Nomad</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Google apps are garbage, reminds me of COBY knockoffs. &amp;nbsp;Free? Except all your content is part of Google&amp;#39;s ad hegemony, per your agreement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3535957" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Google Apps: Productive Anywhere?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/whymicrosoft/archive/2012/09/12/google-apps-productive-anywhere.aspx#3522478</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:38:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3522478</guid><dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the way Microsoft&amp;#39;s online apps are coming along but I would be careful on calling your competitor out as the online Office apps are not full featured. I understand the need to compare the two, but I think it needs to be balanced with some examples of real world use. Just my two cents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3522478" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Google Apps: Productive Anywhere?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/whymicrosoft/archive/2012/09/12/google-apps-productive-anywhere.aspx#3520614</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:54:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3520614</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nathan, Office Web apps are free on Skydrive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3520614" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Google Apps: Productive Anywhere?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/whymicrosoft/archive/2012/09/12/google-apps-productive-anywhere.aspx#3520265</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:12:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3520265</guid><dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;d choose Google Docs over MS Office because it&amp;#39;s free... :P&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3520265" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Google Apps: Productive Anywhere?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/whymicrosoft/archive/2012/09/12/google-apps-productive-anywhere.aspx#3520005</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:41:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3520005</guid><dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What are the system requirements to work offline (what do I need to have installed)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3520005" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>