Why Microsoft

A blog about Microsoft's strategic and technical differentiation.

Office Web Apps vs. Google Docs - See for Yourself

Office Web Apps vs. Google Docs - See for Yourself

  • Comments 32
  • Likes

Top Resources on Why Microsoft Website:  Part 1 of 3

For over two decades, millions of people have been using Microsoft Office to power their businesses.  As we move into the cloud computing age, people expect to share and collaborate with their customers and colleagues with the same level of confidence, whether they are using desktop software or web based services.  We believe a document should look exactly the same in the cloud as the original copy on the desktop.  In today’s post, part 1 of a 3 part series to introduce top resources available on the Why Microsoft web site, you will see a side-by-side comparison of Word Web App vs. Google Documents.  So what's the real cost of Google Apps? See for yourself.

What happens when you take an existing Word document and share it in the cloud? In this demo, you can compare the viewing experience of using the Office Web Apps vs. Google Docs. We took a simple Word file with some of the most commonly used features (header, footer, table, images, etc.) and uploaded it to Google Apps and Windows Live Sky Drive (you can also use SharePoint if applicable). Right away you can see some glaring issues in Google Docs that could significantly affect your business:

Lack of Fit and Finish
The document in Google Docs shows several styling and formatting issues - take a close look at the header, title, and table.  Although these formatting issues may seem small, they affect the overall look and feel of the document making it appear less professional.

Word Web App Result  Google Documents Result

Lost Data and Information
Aside from styling issues, important information could be lost in converting a Word file to Google Docs.  We highlighted a few missing pieces of content in this demo:

  • “Confidential” watermark
  • Revenue Chart
  • Process Map Graphic
  • Footer information
Word Web App Result Google Documents Result

Lost Productivity
There is no ambiguity here whatsoever. The data is lost and the content is altered in your document when using Google Docs to share a Word file. You now have to double check the document for accuracy to make sure all pertinent information is there and then make necessary changes to fix your document before sharing it anywhere.  All this additional time spent reformatting translates to lost productivity.  It does not matter if Google Apps costs $50/user/yr. if it is inadequate for even the simplest business requirements. Most people would not jeopardize their business credibility and ability to deliver professional results.  Would you?

Don’t take my word for it. See the demo for yourself.

If you have already tried Google Docs, tell us your experience in viewing a Word file in the comments below.  Check back next week for Part 2 of Top Resources on Why Microsoft website.

  • Why not just make a PDF if all we are doing is sharing a view-only document?

    To me, the idea that someone would pick up a complicated document like this and edit it in the Word web app is laughable. If I was tasked with editing this doc, I would edit it in the desktop version of Word.

    The fidelity argument will only go so far. Someone out there might be impressed that Microsoft managed to have fidelity between two versions of the same product. Given the history of compatibility issues between versions of the Office, I am a bit surprised actually.

  • @Ian Ray: In collaboration scenario, you definitely would share and grant edit rights to update the document; Google Docs has problems in editing simple Office files. Maintaining view only is for this demo purpose, so the integrity of the doc does not get altered by 3rd party.

    Categorizing a word file with header/footer/images/table as "a complicated document" - I am pretty sure Word users would call these basic features and must-have.

  • Imagine, a Microsoftie stacking the deck to make it look like their own technologies are somehow better, rather than simply different and artificially exclusionary.

    I gather the author thinks that issues with the rendering of MS Office documents in Google Docs is Google's fault. He'd never point out that it's Microsoft's fault for using a proprietary file format and forcing anyone wanting to offer file-level compatibility to reverse engineer that format.

    Ultimately, no one should save files in MS Word format - it's an imposition on the increasing number of people who don't use MS Office, and anyone who actually wants ownership of their own data.

    Once you start authoring documents in Open Document Format (a proper open document standard, unlike MS' file formats), you can transfer documents into Google Docs quite happily, and work on them there (as my business does) or do the same with OpenOffice or LibreOffice. They look great, and we can achieve everything we, as a business supporting lots of customers, needs to. And we don't pay Microsoft's monopoly software rents. In turn, we create no obligation on our collaborators to use MS Office. Win win win.

  • All I have to say is bravo on this.  At least someone has the guts in Microsoft to call out Google's dirty little secrets when it comes to their "productivity" applications.  Keep it up!

  • If anyone wants to see some horror stories of why NOT to touch Google Apps, look at their forums:


    They do not have the engineering talent needed to produce or support an Office suite.

    They've pretty much told their customers to "Go F*** yourselves, we're doing what we want".

  • "Fashions fade, style is eternal." -Yves Saint Laurent As Yves Saint Laurent - renowned French fashion

  • @Eric, I started liking the new docs list format after they fixed a couple of things. Google did fix many of the issues based on user response and it works much better than the initial release.

    However, what they did not do was give us any kind of warning that this was about to happen. The docs list reformatting was completely different and horribly broken as released in February. The docs list debacle is imo the reason why Google now pushes out features in different release tracks.

    Seriously, the first day I used the new docs list, I was completely lost. I bookmarked the old version just to keep track of things. After a month of bugfixes, I prefer the new version. Problem is, Google should have fixed all this stuff before making everyone use it. They literally tested on paying subscribers with this one. And it wasn't like they tested an optional module... the default screen for docs became a beta test.

    I think they learned a valuable lesson from the giant thread about the docs list you referenced.

  • To be honest, both platforms have their advantages and disadvantages.

    Web Apps is for example highly optimized for compatability on any platform however documents are primary intended to be modified with Microsoft Office(Which is a great product!).

    Google aims mostly to work in the "Cloud" via webapplications instead of using fully fledged office applications which also has its own perks however it clearly does require some features. It works well for colabirating with a notepad file(For example). However when it has to look perfect I would't recommend it.

  • I think Word web has a clear explanation than Google documents

  • I would be curious to see a comparison of documents created from scratch with both solutions. The example is very strong for existing documents, but still it is natural to assume that the integration between products made by the same company will better than the one between products of two different ones. I think that what would convince people in the superiority of one solution or the other will be a demo of specific features (styling in this example).

  • Well considering that MS has had these products since early windows 95 days (or earlier), been charging fortunes for "minor" upgrades and consumers paying for largely same functionality over and over with each "upgrade" and google docs only very recently.... I'd say rate of change google docs may have some way to go but they are progressing rapidly!

    Keep going GOOGLE!

  • @Tired:  In this week’s news alone, for Office capabilities are:

    (1) Microsoft has enhanced its Office 365 K plan offering which remains available at the same $2 US per user per month price. See details here:  (http://bit.ly/zwDEGL).  

    (2) Lync 2010 has been recognized by Info World with a 2012 Technology of the Year award, cited here:  (http://bit.ly/zNGD1u). They mention: “The seamless integration of VoIP, videoconferencing, live meetings, instant messaging, and Microsoft Office makes the PC the new center of communications.”

    (3) Office 2010 with Outlook Web Apps has been recognized as 2012 Technology of the Year award by Info World, as described here: (http://bit.ly/x3TjCt) From Info World:  “Finally, don't forget Office Web Apps, the online versions that give Google Docs a run for its money.”

  • this great

  • Office Web Apps is a whole lot more klutzy than Docs when editing online.

    I found myself having to make some minor changes online since the computer I was using did not have Word, and Web Apps really messed up the formatting.

    For online editing, Google Docs is far superior--even working with original DOCX documents.

    Believe me, I would love to switch, but until there are some serious improvements to online editing, it won't happen.

  • Also, do try out collate box it seems very good for online collaboration

Your comment has been posted.   Close
Thank you, your comment requires moderation so it may take a while to appear.   Close
Leave a Comment